PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LB.TO vs. RY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LB.TO vs. RY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LB.TO achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly lower than RY.TO's 24.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LB.TO has underperformed RY.TO with an annualized return of 3.41%, while RY.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.48% annualized return.


LB.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
0.30%
YTD
2.85%
6M
2.85%
1Y
38.70%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
3.41%

RY.TO

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.04%
YTD
24.82%
6M
24.89%
1Y
68.49%
3Y*
37.92%
5Y*
22.33%
10Y*
18.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LB.TO vs. RY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LB.TO
Laurentian Bank of Canada
2.85%48.25%11.32%-9.82%-15.45%33.93%-25.22%23.86%-28.54%2.23%
RY.TO
Royal Bank of Canada
24.82%39.60%34.37%9.80%-1.52%33.09%6.52%14.33%-5.50%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LB.TO and RY.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2006

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between LB.TO and RY.TO has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LB.TO:

CA$1.81B

RY.TO:

CA$402.25B

EPS

LB.TO:

CA$0.63

RY.TO:

CA$15.77

PE Ratio

LB.TO:

64.78

RY.TO:

18.27

PEG Ratio

LB.TO:

0.94

RY.TO:

2.68

PS Ratio

LB.TO:

0.88

RY.TO:

3.36

PB Ratio

LB.TO:

0.72

RY.TO:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

LB.TO:

CA$2.05B

RY.TO:

CA$120.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LB.TO:

CA$667.17M

RY.TO:

CA$65.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

LB.TO:

CA$47.57M

RY.TO:

CA$14.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LB.TO vs. RY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LB.TO
LB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

RY.TO
RY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
RY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LB.TO vs. RY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LB.TORY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.91

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.04

8.47

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.69

31.47

+2.22

LB.TO vs. RY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the RY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LB.TO and RY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LB.TO vs. RY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LB.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, smaller than the maximum RY.TO drawdown of -54.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LB.TO and RY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LB.TORY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-54.03%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.87%

-8.12%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.38%

-16.00%

-25.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.38%

-21.21%

-20.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.49%

-33.84%

-15.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-6.71%

-8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

2.18%

-1.03%

Volatility

LB.TO vs. RY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) is 0.80%, while Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that LB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LB.TORY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

3.52%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

10.35%

-8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.12%

13.83%

+7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.40%

14.94%

+11.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.01%

17.23%

+8.78%

Dividends

LB.TO vs. RY.TO - Dividend Comparison

LB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than RY.TO's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LB.TO
Laurentian Bank of Canada
4.64%4.67%6.49%5.02%5.57%4.08%5.99%5.94%6.72%4.39%4.14%4.64%
RY.TO
Royal Bank of Canada
2.21%2.58%3.23%3.99%3.90%3.22%4.10%3.96%4.03%3.39%3.57%4.15%

Financials

LB.TO vs. RY.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laurentian Bank of Canada and Royal Bank of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
453.55M
33.95B
(LB.TO) Total Revenue
(RY.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

LB.TO vs. RY.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Laurentian Bank of Canada and Royal Bank of Canada over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
25.2%
48.7%
Portfolio components
LB.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Laurentian Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 114.22M and revenue of 453.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

RY.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 16.52B and revenue of 33.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

LB.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Laurentian Bank of Canada reported an operating income of -32.71M and revenue of 453.55M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.2%.

RY.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 7.10B and revenue of 33.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

LB.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Laurentian Bank of Canada reported a net income of -20.59M and revenue of 453.55M, resulting in a net margin of -4.5%.

RY.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a net income of 5.51B and revenue of 33.95B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LB.TO and RY.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LB.TO and RY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer