PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAZ vs. VZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAZ vs. VZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAZ achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LAZ has outperformed VZ with an annualized return of 8.71%, while VZ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.


LAZ

1D
-4.51%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-13.67%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*
8.71%

VZ

1D
1.11%
1M
-3.92%
YTD
15.03%
6M
12.38%
1Y
10.56%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAZ vs. VZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
-2.67%-1.64%54.83%6.92%-16.21%7.41%12.08%15.22%-25.38%36.20%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
15.03%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between LAZ and VZ is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2005

0.26

The correlation between LAZ and VZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAZ:

$4.95B

VZ:

$191.01B

EPS

LAZ:

$2.61

VZ:

$4.10

PE Ratio

LAZ:

17.77

VZ:

11.06

PS Ratio

LAZ:

1.50

VZ:

1.38

PB Ratio

LAZ:

5.62

VZ:

1.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAZ:

$3.28B

VZ:

$139.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAZ:

$1.54B

VZ:

$81.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

LAZ:

$477.61M

VZ:

$48.65B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAZ vs. VZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAZ
LAZ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAZ vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Ltd (LAZ) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAZVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.12

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

0.89

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

1.91

-1.10

LAZ vs. VZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the VZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAZ and VZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAZVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

0.53

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.07

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.20

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.20

-0.02

Drawdowns

LAZ vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAZ drawdown since its inception was -62.72%, which is greater than VZ's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAZ and VZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAZVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.72%

-50.66%

-12.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

-13.32%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.24%

-14.93%

-29.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.24%

-38.38%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.51%

-41.21%

-18.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.52%

-10.37%

-8.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.47%

-14.83%

-8.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.38%

6.20%

+7.18%

Volatility

LAZ vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Ltd (LAZ) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) at 6.17%. This indicates that LAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAZVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.34%

6.17%

+5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.19%

17.96%

+12.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.21%

22.57%

+14.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.88%

21.60%

+15.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.06%

20.35%

+15.71%

Dividends

LAZ vs. VZ - Dividend Comparison

LAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than VZ's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
4.31%4.12%3.89%5.75%5.60%4.31%4.44%5.88%8.21%5.35%6.55%5.22%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
6.09%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Financials

LAZ vs. VZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lazard Ltd and Verizon Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
779.40M
34.44B
(LAZ) Total Revenue
(VZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LAZ vs. VZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lazard Ltd and Verizon Communications Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
60.3%
Portfolio components
LAZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a gross profit of 779.40M and revenue of 779.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

VZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.77B and revenue of 34.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

LAZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported an operating income of 112.39M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

VZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported an operating income of 8.24B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

LAZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a net income of 100.92M and revenue of 779.40M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

VZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a net income of 5.05B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LAZ and VZ have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAZ has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to VZ (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAZ dropped -62.72% vs VZ's -50.66%.

VZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAZ and VZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer