PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAVLX vs. LIFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAVLX vs. LIFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAVLX achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly higher than LIFIX's 0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LAVLX has outperformed LIFIX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while LIFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.98% annualized return.


LAVLX

1D
0.89%
1M
2.76%
YTD
13.54%
6M
12.08%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
9.27%

LIFIX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAVLX vs. LIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
13.54%7.28%14.96%15.50%-11.02%28.79%2.73%22.92%-14.55%7.06%
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
0.91%7.16%4.81%3.87%-5.34%10.43%6.05%5.17%-1.06%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LAVLX and LIFIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011

0.31

The correlation between LAVLX and LIFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAVLX vs. LIFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAVLX
LAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LIFIX
LIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAVLX vs. LIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAVLXLIFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.28

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

13.18

-0.50

LAVLX vs. LIFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the LIFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAVLX and LIFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAVLX vs. LIFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than LIFIX's maximum drawdown of -18.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAVLX and LIFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAVLXLIFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.58%

-18.02%

-42.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-1.27%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-2.11%

-18.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-8.49%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

-18.02%

-24.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.18%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-3.22%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

0.32%

+1.77%

Volatility

LAVLX vs. LIFIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund (LIFIX) at 0.95%. This indicates that LAVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAVLXLIFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

0.95%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

1.78%

+7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

2.39%

+10.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

3.99%

+13.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

4.53%

+15.06%

LAVLX vs. LIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAVLX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than LIFIX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAVLX vs. LIFIX - Dividend Comparison

LAVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than LIFIX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
6.20%7.04%9.70%1.23%8.40%8.51%1.19%3.19%6.55%2.67%0.60%0.79%
LIFIX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund
4.97%4.94%4.17%3.88%2.77%2.55%3.77%4.15%4.18%3.96%4.43%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAVLX and LIFIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAVLX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to LIFIX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAVLX dropped -60.58% vs LIFIX's -18.02%.

LAVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAVLX and LIFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer