LASR vs. PSI
LASR (nLIGHT, Inc.) is a stock, while PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Over the past 5 years, LASR returned 16.34%/yr vs 30.24%/yr for PSI. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LASR vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LASR achieves a 83.39% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 92.36% return.
LASR
- 1D
- -4.52%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- 6M
- 65.48%
- YTD
- 83.39%
- 1Y
- 276.31%
- 3Y*
- 66.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.34%
- 10Y*
- —
PSI
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- -9.65%
- 6M
- 70.26%
- YTD
- 92.36%
- 1Y
- 145.96%
- 3Y*
- 48.79%
- 5Y*
- 30.24%
- 10Y*
- 32.69%
LASR vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LASR nLIGHT, Inc. | 83.39% | 257.58% | -22.30% | 33.14% | -57.66% | -26.65% | 61.00% | 14.06% | -22.70% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 92.36% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -9.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between LASR and PSI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between LASR and PSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LASR vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
LASR
PSI
LASR vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LASR | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.00 | 6.99 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.71 | 27.18 | +0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LASR vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LASR drawdown since its inception was -85.66%, which is greater than PSI's maximum drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LASR and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LASR | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.66% | -62.96% | -22.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.92% | -21.02% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.29% | -41.07% | -16.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.47% | -44.85% | -36.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.02% | -19.24% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.38% | -15.89% | -36.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.02% | 5.39% | +4.63% |
Volatility
LASR vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) has a higher volatility of 33.08% compared to Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) at 25.70%. This indicates that LASR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LASR | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.08% | 25.70% | +7.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.18% | 39.73% | +27.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.26% | 46.19% | +38.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.77% | 39.72% | +27.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.33% | 36.05% | +31.28% |
Dividends
LASR vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
LASR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LASR nLIGHT, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.03% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LASR and PSI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LASR has higher volatility (33.08%) compared to PSI (25.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LASR dropped -85.66% vs PSI's -62.96%.
LASR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LASR and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer