PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LANDP vs. MPLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LANDP vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (LANDP) and MPLX LP (MPLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LANDP achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly higher than MPLX's 13.84% return.


LANDP

1D
-0.30%
1M
4.81%
6M
11.40%
YTD
15.98%
1Y
14.71%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.13%

MPLX

1D
1.46%
1M
2.26%
6M
8.69%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
28.15%
5Y*
26.27%
10Y*
16.18%
ALL TIME*
14.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$531.79K$449.93K$459.67K
$99.98M$86.91M$97.76M

LANDP vs. MPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LANDP
Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
15.98%-1.26%17.22%-7.47%
MPLX
MPLX LP
13.84%20.54%41.72%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LANDP and MPLX is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023

0.09

The correlation between LANDP and MPLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LANDP:

$760.12M

MPLX:

$59.31B

EPS

LANDP:

-$0.31

MPLX:

$6.94

PS Ratio

LANDP:

9.22

MPLX:

3.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

LANDP:

$86.33M

MPLX:

$12.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LANDP:

$12.83M

MPLX:

$7.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

LANDP:

$64.70M

MPLX:

$6.90B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LANDP vs. MPLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LANDP
LANDP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LANDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LANDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LANDP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LANDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LANDP Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MPLX
MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LANDP vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (LANDP) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LANDPMPLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.66

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

6.14

+1.19

LANDP vs. MPLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LANDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the MPLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LANDP and MPLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LANDP vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANDP drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum MPLX drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANDP and MPLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LANDPMPLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-85.72%

+65.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.57%

-7.71%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.82%

-14.58%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-1.27%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-29.68%

+23.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

3.33%

-1.35%

Volatility

LANDP vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (LANDP) is 2.49%, while MPLX LP (MPLX) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that LANDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LANDPMPLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

5.31%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.27%

11.75%

-5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.84%

16.45%

-7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

18.96%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

30.42%

-15.31%

Dividends

LANDP vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison

LANDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, which matches MPLX's 7.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LANDP
Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
7.13%7.92%7.25%4.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MPLX
MPLX LP
7.16%7.39%7.33%8.65%8.80%11.30%12.70%10.41%8.22%6.23%5.86%4.33%

Financials

LANDP vs. MPLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and MPLX LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LANDP vs. MPLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and MPLX LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LANDP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 14.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.

MPLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MPLX LP reported a gross profit of 2.64B and revenue of 3.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

LANDP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock reported an operating income of 12.68M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 85.7%.

MPLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MPLX LP reported an operating income of 1.21B and revenue of 3.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.0%.

LANDP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation 6.00% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock reported a net income of -9.99M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in a net margin of -67.5%.

MPLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MPLX LP reported a net income of 922.00M and revenue of 3.04B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LANDP and MPLX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPLX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to LANDP (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LANDP dropped -20.10% vs MPLX's -85.72%.

LANDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LANDP and MPLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer