LALT vs. RLY
LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and RLY (State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. LALT is actively managed, while RLY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LALT returned 9.26%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for RLY. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LALT charges 1.94%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.
Performance
LALT vs. RLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LALT achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 15.77% return.
LALT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 16.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.28%
RLY
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.87M | $2.25M | $4.61M | |
| $4.60M | $7.84M | $7.75M |
LALT vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 8.61% | 10.79% | 8.77% | 0.88% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 15.77% | 20.26% | 2.53% | -1.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LALT and RLY is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between LALT and RLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LALT vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank
LALT
RLY
LALT vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LALT | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.48 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 3.66 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 12.77 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LALT vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LALT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALT and RLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LALT | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -37.75% | +30.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.72% | -7.54% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | -10.08% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -2.74% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -9.40% | +8.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 2.16% | -0.84% |
Volatility
LALT vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) is 1.04%, while State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that LALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LALT | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 2.68% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.42% | 8.44% | -3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.95% | 10.60% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 13.46% | -7.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 13.80% | -8.03% |
LALT vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LALT has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LALT vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison
LALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than RLY's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 3.73% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 3.06% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LALT and RLY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLY has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to LALT (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LALT dropped -6.97% vs RLY's -37.75%.
On 3-year performance, RLY leads with 12.72% vs 9.26% for LALT. On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, LALT has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RLY has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.
LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 3.06% for RLY.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for LALT and 0.50% for RLY.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LALT and RLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer