LALT vs. GRID
LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) are both exchange-traded funds - LALT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. LALT is actively managed, while GRID is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LALT returned 10.48%/yr vs 26.27%/yr for GRID. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LALT charges 1.94%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
LALT vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LALT achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return.
LALT
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 28.91%
- 6M
- 29.60%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
LALT vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 10.70% | 10.79% | 8.77% | 0.88% |
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 28.91% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LALT and GRID is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.37 |
The correlation between LALT and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LALT vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LALT
GRID
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Financial Services
LALT
GRID
-
Technology
LALT
GRID
Consumer Cyclical
LALT
GRID
Industrials
LALT
GRID
Healthcare
LALT
GRID
-
Energy
LALT
GRID
-
Consumer Defensive
LALT
GRID
-
Communication Services
LALT
GRID
-
Basic Materials
LALT
GRID
Real Estate
LALT
GRID
-
Utilities
LALT
GRID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LALT vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
LALT
GRID
LALT vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LALT | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.45 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | 4.42 | +3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.25 | 16.72 | +13.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LALT | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28 | 2.67 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.57 | +1.05 |
Drawdowns
LALT vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LALT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALT and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LALT | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -40.56% | +33.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -11.73% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | -20.77% | +13.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.33% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -8.43% | +7.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 3.09% | -2.35% |
Volatility
LALT vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) is 1.23%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that LALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LALT | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 7.95% | -6.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | 16.08% | -10.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 19.39% | -12.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 21.00% | -15.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 22.81% | -17.03% |
LALT vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
LALT has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
LALT vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
LALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 0.77% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 3.68% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LALT and GRID have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to LALT (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LALT dropped -6.97% vs GRID's -40.56%.
On 3-year performance, GRID leads with 26.27% vs 10.48% for LALT. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, LALT has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GRID has performed better with a 26.27% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.
LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.
LALT is categorized as Global Allocation, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for LALT and 0.70% for GRID.
LALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LALT and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer