LAGWX vs. LGLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX).
LAGWX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Oct 10, 1973. LGLIX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011.
Performance
LAGWX vs. LGLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LAGWX vs. LGLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAGWX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund | -0.55% | 14.37% | 21.89% | 8.50% | -36.09% | -2.77% | 72.40% | 31.47% | 4.52% | 29.92% |
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | -10.26% | 16.49% | 44.97% | 33.29% | -38.73% | 8.62% | 77.55% | 35.02% | -1.08% | 31.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAGWX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly higher than LGLIX's -10.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LAGWX has underperformed LGLIX with an annualized return of 11.97%, while LGLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.
LAGWX
- 1D
- 6.25%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 38.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- -2.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
LGLIX
- 1D
- 5.01%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -10.26%
- 6M
- -13.13%
- 1Y
- 19.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LAGWX vs. LGLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAGWX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLIX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LAGWX vs. LGLIX — Risk / Return Rank
LAGWX
LGLIX
LAGWX vs. LGLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAGWX | LGLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.78 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 1.24 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 0.96 | +1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | 2.94 | +6.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAGWX | LGLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.78 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.25 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.64 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.64 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between LAGWX and LGLIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LAGWX vs. LGLIX - Dividend Comparison
LAGWX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAGWX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.60% | 9.67% | 22.87% | 33.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.03% |
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund | 2.22% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.83% | 9.27% | 8.01% | 19.82% | 6.46% | 0.00% | 4.84% |
Drawdowns
LAGWX vs. LGLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAGWX drawdown since its inception was -60.31%, which is greater than LGLIX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAGWX and LGLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAGWX | LGLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.31% | -45.95% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.72% | -21.01% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.25% | -45.95% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.38% | -45.95% | -8.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.67% | -17.06% | -4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.11% | -9.38% | -7.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 6.88% | -2.81% |
Volatility
LAGWX vs. LGLIX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) at 9.60%. This indicates that LAGWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LAGWX | LGLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.67% | 9.60% | +3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.98% | 17.16% | +3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.57% | 27.05% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 25.87% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 24.70% | +2.31% |