PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAGWX vs. VVOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAGWX vs. VVOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) and Invesco Value Opportunities Fund (VVOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAGWX achieves a 29.96% return, which is significantly higher than VVOAX's 18.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LAGWX has underperformed VVOAX with an annualized return of 14.74%, while VVOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.88% annualized return.


LAGWX

1D
-0.54%
1M
10.33%
YTD
29.96%
6M
29.01%
1Y
61.07%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
14.74%

VVOAX

1D
0.54%
1M
2.65%
YTD
18.92%
6M
21.57%
1Y
45.92%
3Y*
30.24%
5Y*
17.40%
10Y*
15.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAGWX vs. VVOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAGWX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund
29.96%14.37%21.89%8.50%-36.09%-2.77%72.40%31.47%4.52%29.92%
VVOAX
Invesco Value Opportunities Fund
18.92%20.24%30.01%15.20%1.33%35.60%5.49%29.84%-19.92%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LAGWX and VVOAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2001

0.75

The correlation between LAGWX and VVOAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (10 years) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAGWX vs. VVOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAGWX
LAGWX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LAGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LAGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VVOAX
VVOAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VVOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VVOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAGWX vs. VVOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) and Invesco Value Opportunities Fund (VVOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAGWXVVOAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

2.70

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

3.46

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

4.95

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.20

17.77

-1.56

LAGWX vs. VVOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAGWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the VVOAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAGWX and VVOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAGWXVVOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.70

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.83

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.66

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.40

+0.10

Drawdowns

LAGWX vs. VVOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAGWX drawdown since its inception was -60.31%, roughly equal to the maximum VVOAX drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAGWX and VVOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAGWXVVOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.31%

-62.08%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.72%

-9.21%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.10%

-24.05%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.25%

-24.05%

-27.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.38%

-51.80%

-2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.46%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.07%

-11.73%

-5.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

2.56%

+1.38%

Volatility

LAGWX vs. VVOAX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) has a higher volatility of 9.54% compared to Invesco Value Opportunities Fund (VVOAX) at 4.68%. This indicates that LAGWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VVOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAGWXVVOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.54%

4.68%

+4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.57%

13.33%

+8.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.58%

17.46%

+9.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.67%

21.08%

+6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.24%

24.18%

+3.06%

LAGWX vs. VVOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAGWX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than VVOAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAGWX vs. VVOAX - Dividend Comparison

LAGWX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VVOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAGWX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%12.60%9.67%22.87%33.87%0.00%0.00%10.03%
VVOAX
Invesco Value Opportunities Fund
8.77%10.43%7.79%2.27%9.79%8.82%0.25%1.95%15.44%5.11%1.10%15.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAGWX and VVOAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAGWX has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to VVOAX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAGWX dropped -60.31% vs VVOAX's -62.08%.

VVOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAGWX and VVOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer