PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAFFX vs. LABFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAFFX vs. LABFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAFFX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than LABFX's 5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, LAFFX has outperformed LABFX with an annualized return of 10.75%, while LABFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.34% annualized return.


LAFFX

1D
0.14%
1M
2.53%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.55%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
10.75%

LABFX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.31%
YTD
5.54%
6M
5.82%
1Y
15.81%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
7.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAFFX vs. LABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
9.14%15.75%17.30%10.50%-9.80%26.77%-1.29%25.24%-7.59%16.16%
LABFX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund
5.54%12.93%15.10%11.91%-16.16%4.46%19.37%19.78%-10.25%8.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LAFFX and LABFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1994

0.94

The correlation between LAFFX and LABFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAFFX vs. LABFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAFFX
LAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

LABFX
LABFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAFFX vs. LABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAFFXLABFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.66

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

11.34

+0.90

LAFFX vs. LABFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the LABFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAFFX and LABFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAFFXLABFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.13

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.42

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.65

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.62

-0.17

Drawdowns

LAFFX vs. LABFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAFFX drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, which is greater than LABFX's maximum drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAFFX and LABFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAFFXLABFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.50%

-41.58%

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-6.10%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

-10.38%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-26.26%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.59%

-26.26%

-13.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-5.18%

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.43%

+0.38%

Volatility

LAFFX vs. LABFX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) at 2.39%. This indicates that LAFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAFFXLABFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.39%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

6.17%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

7.64%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

10.38%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

11.40%

+6.05%

LAFFX vs. LABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAFFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LABFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAFFX vs. LABFX - Dividend Comparison

LAFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than LABFX's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LABFX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund
2.23%2.27%2.52%2.25%1.81%13.30%5.83%3.04%5.83%4.39%3.32%7.83%
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
6.59%7.49%6.32%1.69%7.86%3.86%1.93%4.31%11.75%11.96%7.76%10.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAFFX and LABFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAFFX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to LABFX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAFFX dropped -60.50% vs LABFX's -41.58%.

LABFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAFFX and LABFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer