LAES vs. PRZO
LAES (SEALSQ Corp) and PRZO (ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares) are both stocks. LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while PRZO operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past year, LAES returned -27.06% vs -49.14% for PRZO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAES vs. PRZO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly higher than PRZO's -26.98% return.
LAES
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -33.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRZO
- 1D
- -3.06%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- -26.98%
- 6M
- -52.77%
- 1Y
- -49.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAES vs. PRZO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -17.99% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -87.91% |
PRZO ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares | -26.98% | -59.85% | 185.59% | -82.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAES and PRZO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, LAES and PRZO have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LAES:
-$0.43
PRZO:
-$0.33
LAES:
10.21
PRZO:
13.95
LAES:
$35.37M
PRZO:
$741.37K
LAES:
$13.21M
PRZO:
-$40.47K
LAES:
-$41.81M
PRZO:
-$7.24M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAES vs. PRZO — Risk / Return Rank
LAES
PRZO
LAES vs. PRZO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares (PRZO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAES | PRZO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.99 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.64 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | -1.16 | +0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAES vs. PRZO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, which is greater than PRZO's maximum drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and PRZO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAES | PRZO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.44% | -88.53% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.68% | -76.78% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.89% | -85.45% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.60% | -74.24% | -10.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.58% | 42.41% | +1.17% |
Volatility
LAES vs. PRZO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) is 28.38%, while ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares (PRZO) has a volatility of 50.24%. This indicates that LAES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRZO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAES | PRZO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.38% | 50.24% | -21.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.23% | 91.31% | -25.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.13% | 117.45% | -8.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.29% | 174.37% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.29% | 174.37% | -4.08% |
Dividends
LAES vs. PRZO - Dividend Comparison
Neither LAES nor PRZO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LAES vs. PRZO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LAES and PRZO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRZO has higher volatility (50.24%) compared to LAES (28.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs PRZO's -88.53%.
LAES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAES and PRZO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer