LAES vs. LUNR
LAES (SEALSQ Corp) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) are both stocks. LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, LAES returned -33.31%/yr vs 42.24%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAES vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.
LAES
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -33.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 122.39%
- 1Y
- 144.44%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAES vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -17.99% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.02% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -65.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAES and LUNR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, LAES and LUNR have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LAES:
-$0.43
LUNR:
-$0.00
LAES:
10.21
LUNR:
2.95K
LAES:
$35.37M
LUNR:
$334.27M
LAES:
$13.21M
LUNR:
$85.92M
LAES:
-$41.81M
LUNR:
-$96.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAES vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank
LAES
LUNR
LAES vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAES | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.26 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 3.47 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 7.12 | -7.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAES vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and LUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAES | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.44% | -97.43% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.68% | -41.94% | -30.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.07% | -78.54% | -19.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.89% | -67.53% | -18.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.60% | -63.21% | -21.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.58% | 20.37% | +23.21% |
Volatility
LAES vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) is 28.38%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that LAES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAES | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.38% | 42.95% | -14.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.23% | 93.42% | -27.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.13% | 111.16% | -2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.29% | 171.29% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.29% | 171.29% | -1.00% |
Dividends
LAES vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison
Neither LAES nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LAES vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LAES and LUNR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to LAES (28.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs LUNR's -97.43%.
LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAES and LUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer