LABX vs. SMU

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

LABX (Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF) and SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

LABX vs. SMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABX achieves a 236.94% return, which is significantly higher than SMU's -78.32% return.

LABX

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: 13.79%
• 6M: 260.99%
• YTD: 236.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMU

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -22.31%
• 6M: -89.12%
• YTD: -78.32%
• 1Y: -98.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABX vs. SMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LABX Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF	236.94%	-42.53%
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	-78.32%	-91.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LABX and SMU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

LABX vs. SMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

LABX vs. SMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABX drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, smaller than the maximum SMU drawdown of -99.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABX and SMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LABX	SMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.93%	-99.13%	+8.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-99.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.24%	-99.08%	+68.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.77%	-77.86%	+25.09%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LABX	SMU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	191.69%	200.63%	-8.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	191.69%	200.63%	-8.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	191.69%	200.63%	-8.94%

LABX vs. SMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LABX and SMU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

LABX vs. SMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither LABX nor SMU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LABX and SMU in my portfolio?

LABX and SMU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LABX or SMU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LABX or SMU?

LABX and SMU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LABX or SMU?

LABX and SMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.