PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABX vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABX vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABX achieves a 236.94% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 619.42% return.


LABX

1D
-2.36%
1M
13.48%
6M
260.99%
YTD
236.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
-2.53%
1M
-13.48%
6M
404.87%
YTD
619.42%
1Y
2,882.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABX vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LABX
Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF
236.94%-42.53%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
619.42%331.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LABX and MULL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABX vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABX vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LABXMULLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

56.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

173.42

LABX vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LABX vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABX drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABX and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABXMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.93%

-72.29%

-18.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.24%

-39.88%

+9.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.77%

-20.78%

-31.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.16%

Volatility

LABX vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABXMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

68.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

124.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.69%

151.84%

+39.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.69%

144.77%

+46.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.69%

144.77%

+46.92%

LABX vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABX vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

LABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM2025
LABX
Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
0.05%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


LABX and MULL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LABX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LABX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for LABX.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LABX and 1.50% for MULL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABX and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer