LABX vs. INTW
LABX (Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LABX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
LABX vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABX achieves a 74.20% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 259.86% return.
LABX
- 1D
- 7.97%
- 1M
- -47.53%
- 6M
- 121.72%
- YTD
- 74.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -47.68%
- 6M
- 152.57%
- YTD
- 259.86%
- 1Y
- 991.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 233.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $147.32M | $136.96M | $217.62M | |
| $10.13M | $17.26M | $25.80M |
LABX vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LABX Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF | 74.20% | -42.53% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 259.86% | 165.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABX and INTW is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABX vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
LABX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
LABX vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LABX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 13.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 36.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABX vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABX drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -69.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABX and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.93% | -69.16% | -21.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.93% | -62.96% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -30.60% | -22.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.56% | — |
Volatility
LABX vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 48.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 117.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 196.34% | 157.38% | +38.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 196.34% | 150.65% | +45.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 196.34% | 150.65% | +45.69% |
LABX vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABX vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither LABX nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LABX and INTW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LABX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LABX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
LABX and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LABX and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for LABX and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer