LABX vs. CRMG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LABX (Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LABX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

LABX vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABX achieves a 74.20% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -60.18% return.

LABX

• 1D: 7.97%
• 1M: -47.53%
• 6M: 121.72%
• YTD: 74.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CRMG

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: 19.47%
• 6M: -36.29%
• YTD: -60.18%
• 1Y: -59.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -50.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	$29.47M	$25.73M	$19.66M
LABX Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF	$10.13M	$17.26M	$25.80M

LABX vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LABX Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF	74.20%	-42.53%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-60.18%	19.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LABX and CRMG is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

LABX vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LABX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LABX vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LABX	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.76	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.06	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.88	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.85	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.43	—

Drawdowns

LABX vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABX drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABX and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LABX	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.93%	-79.83%	-11.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-73.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.93%	-70.86%	+6.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.31%	-42.13%	-11.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	43.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LABX	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	28.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	66.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	196.34%	81.64%	+114.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	196.34%	77.54%	+118.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	196.34%	77.54%	+118.80%

LABX vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LABX vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LABX nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LABX and CRMG in my portfolio?

LABX and CRMG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LABX or CRMG?

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LABX or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LABX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LABX or CRMG?

LABX and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LABX and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LABX and 0.75% for CRMG.