LABU vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. LABU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LABU charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

LABU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 47.57% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

LABU

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 34.26%
• YTD: 47.57%
• 6M: 36.98%
• 1Y: 324.35%
• 3Y*: 23.36%
• 5Y*: -31.01%
• 10Y*: -7.18%

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	47.57%	16.43%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and LINT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.34

LABU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LABU	LINT
Healthcare	99.7%	-
Financial Services	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LABU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU

LABU Risk / Return Rank: 91
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LABU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.90	—	—

Drawdowns

LABU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LABU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.18%	-49.54%	-49.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.80%	-12.86%	-81.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.72%	-20.48%	-61.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LABU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.78%	168.83%	-90.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.94%	168.83%	-72.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.44%	168.83%	-73.39%

LABU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

LABU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	0.52%	0.84%	0.35%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.64%	0.17%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LABU and LINT in my portfolio?

LABU and LINT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LABU or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LABU or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LABU or LINT?

LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

What is the main difference between LABU and LINT?

Their fees differ too: 1.12% for LABU and 0.97% for LINT.