PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABFX vs. SCLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABFX vs. SCLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABFX achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than SCLAX's 2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, LABFX has outperformed SCLAX with an annualized return of 7.34%, while SCLAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.24% annualized return.


LABFX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.31%
YTD
5.54%
6M
5.82%
1Y
15.81%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
7.34%

SCLAX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.16%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.77%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
3.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABFX vs. SCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABFX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund
5.54%12.93%15.10%11.91%-16.16%4.46%19.37%19.78%-10.25%8.84%
SCLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund
2.66%6.49%4.92%6.96%-3.74%1.72%3.30%7.91%-0.67%3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LABFX and SCLAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.71

The correlation between LABFX and SCLAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABFX vs. SCLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABFX
LABFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SCLAX
SCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABFX vs. SCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LABFXSCLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.58

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.12

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.34

12.54

-1.20

LABFX vs. SCLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the SCLAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABFX and SCLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABFXSCLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.76

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.14

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

1.18

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.02

-0.41

Drawdowns

LABFX vs. SCLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABFX drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than SCLAX's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABFX and SCLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABFXSCLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-5.59%

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-2.32%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.38%

-3.41%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.26%

-5.59%

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.26%

-5.59%

-20.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-1.15%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

0.58%

+0.85%

Volatility

LABFX vs. SCLAX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) at 0.95%. This indicates that LABFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABFXSCLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

0.95%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.17%

2.07%

+4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.64%

2.63%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

3.08%

+7.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

2.76%

+8.64%

LABFX vs. SCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SCLAX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABFX vs. SCLAX - Dividend Comparison

LABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SCLAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LABFX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund
2.23%2.27%2.52%2.25%1.81%13.30%5.83%3.04%5.83%4.39%3.32%7.83%
SCLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund
1.83%1.88%7.87%4.06%1.90%2.79%1.01%4.67%0.54%3.77%0.69%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


LABFX and SCLAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABFX has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to SCLAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABFX dropped -41.58% vs SCLAX's -5.59%.

SCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABFX and SCLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer