PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABFX vs. LBNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABFX vs. LBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABFX achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than LBNDX's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LABFX has outperformed LBNDX with an annualized return of 6.98%, while LBNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.78% annualized return.


LABFX

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.21%
6M
3.62%
YTD
5.65%
1Y
11.31%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
6.98%
ALL TIME*
6.93%

LBNDX

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.61%
YTD
0.31%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*
3.78%
ALL TIME*
5.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LABFX vs. LBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABFX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund
5.65%12.93%15.10%11.91%-16.16%4.46%19.37%19.78%-10.25%8.84%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
0.31%8.42%6.29%6.38%-13.67%3.25%7.65%13.40%-3.76%9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LABFX and LBNDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1994

0.63

The correlation between LABFX and LBNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABFX vs. LBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LABFX
LABFX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

LBNDX
LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LABFX vs. LBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LABFXLBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.08

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.32

4.03

+4.29

LABFX vs. LBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the LBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABFX and LBNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LABFX vs. LBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABFX drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than LBNDX's maximum drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABFX and LBNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABFXLBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-26.67%

-14.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-4.08%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.38%

-4.51%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.26%

-17.33%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.26%

-19.77%

-6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.65%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-3.51%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.09%

+0.40%

Volatility

LABFX vs. LBNDX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) at 0.90%. This indicates that LABFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABFXLBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

0.90%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

3.24%

+3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.38%

4.06%

+4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.42%

4.72%

+5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.34%

5.00%

+6.34%

LABFX vs. LBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LBNDX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABFX vs. LBNDX - Dividend Comparison

LABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than LBNDX's 5.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LABFX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund
2.07%2.27%2.52%2.25%1.81%13.30%5.83%3.04%5.83%4.39%3.32%7.83%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
5.66%5.92%5.38%4.66%3.67%3.71%3.72%4.02%6.43%4.82%4.58%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


LABFX and LBNDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABFX has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to LBNDX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABFX dropped -41.58% vs LBNDX's -26.67%.

LABFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABFX and LBNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer