LABD vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LABD (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - LABD tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (-300%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LABD returned -87.02% vs 2796.55% for MUU. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. LABD charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

LABD vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABD achieves a -61.31% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 575.80% return.

LABD

• 1D: 7.19%
• 1M: -38.51%
• 6M: -59.02%
• YTD: -61.31%
• 1Y: -87.02%
• 3Y*: -59.73%
• 5Y*: -47.75%
• 10Y*: -58.40%

MUU

• 1D: -9.01%
• 1M: -18.36%
• 6M: 372.65%
• YTD: 575.80%
• 1Y: 2,796.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABD vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares	-61.31%	-70.07%	17.17%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	575.80%	599.03%	-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LABD and MUU is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	-0.34

Return for Risk

LABD vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABD

LABD Risk / Return Rank: 1
LABD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
LABD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
LABD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
LABD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
LABD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABD vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LABD	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	23.95	-25.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.72	5.62	-8.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	1.69	-0.99
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	66.09	-67.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	221.31	-222.67

LABD vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABD Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 23.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABD and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LABD vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABD and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LABD	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-75.07%	-24.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-89.59%	-52.72%	-36.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-36.32%	-63.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-91.03%	-23.43%	-67.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	63.83%	16.57%	+47.26%

Volatility

LABD vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) is 24.76%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.81%. This indicates that LABD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LABD	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.76%	67.81%	-43.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.13%	116.35%	-51.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.49%	145.78%	-66.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	96.77%	138.10%	-41.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.76%	138.10%	-42.34%

LABD vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

LABD vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

LABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than MUU's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares	8.12%	6.67%	4.68%	6.13%	0.53%	0.00%	3.94%	1.75%	0.81%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.70%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LABD and MUU in my portfolio?

LABD and MUU have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LABD or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (67.81%) compared to LABD (24.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABD dropped -100.00% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, LABD or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2796.55% vs -87.02% for LABD. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, LABD has been the lower-risk option at 24.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LABD or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2796.55% return vs -87.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LABD or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for LABD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LABD or MUU?

LABD has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 0.70% for MUU.

What is the main difference between LABD and MUU?

LABD tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (-300%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for LABD and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (23.95 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.