LABD vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LABD (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LABD is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, LABD returned -87.04% vs 1964.55% for INTW. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. LABD charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

LABD vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABD achieves a -53.78% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.

LABD

• 1D: -3.10%
• 1M: -32.29%
• YTD: -53.78%
• 6M: -50.39%
• 1Y: -87.04%
• 3Y*: -56.99%
• 5Y*: -43.25%
• 10Y*: -59.09%

INTW

• 1D: -12.49%
• 1M: 12.21%
• YTD: 750.22%
• 6M: 775.58%
• 1Y: 1,964.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABD vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares	-53.78%	-69.56%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	750.22%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between LABD and INTW is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	-0.36

Return for Risk

LABD vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABD

LABD Risk / Return Rank: 1
LABD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
LABD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
LABD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
LABD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
LABD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABD vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LABD	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.11	13.25	-14.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.73	5.13	-7.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	1.65	-0.95
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	40.32	-41.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	91.49	-92.87

LABD vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABD Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABD and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LABD vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABD and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	LABD	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-60.58%	-39.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.75%	-49.34%	-37.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-12.49%	-87.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-90.99%	-29.66%	-61.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	64.00%	21.70%	+42.30%

Volatility

LABD vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) is 29.98%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that LABD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LABD	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.98%	55.81%	-25.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.23%	119.10%	-53.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.79%	150.14%	-71.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	96.66%	148.88%	-52.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.97%	148.88%	-52.91%

LABD vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LABD vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

LABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LABD Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares	9.79%	6.67%	4.68%	6.13%	0.53%	0.00%	3.94%	1.75%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LABD and INTW in my portfolio?

LABD and INTW have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LABD or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to LABD (29.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABD dropped -99.99% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, LABD or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs -87.04% for LABD. On fees, LABD is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, LABD has been the lower-risk option at 29.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LABD or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs -87.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LABD or INTW?

LABD is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LABD or INTW?

LABD has the higher dividend yield at 9.79%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between LABD and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for LABD and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.