L4K3.DE vs. CHIN.DE
L4K3.DE (Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc) and CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) are both China Equities funds - L4K3.DE tracks the MSCI China while CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, L4K3.DE returned -4.05% vs 19.18% for CHIN.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. L4K3.DE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CHIN.DE.
Performance
L4K3.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L4K3.DE achieves a -9.66% return, which is significantly lower than CHIN.DE's 3.48% return.
L4K3.DE
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- -13.07%
- YTD
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- -4.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- -4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 19.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
L4K3.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
L4K3.DE Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc | -9.66% | 17.16% | 27.31% | -8.34% |
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 3.48% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between L4K3.DE and CHIN.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between L4K3.DE and CHIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L4K3.DE vs. CHIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
L4K3.DE
CHIN.DE
L4K3.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc (L4K3.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| L4K3.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 2.30 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 5.60 | -5.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
L4K3.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L4K3.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than CHIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L4K3.DE and CHIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L4K3.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -22.95% | -32.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.86% | -8.84% | -12.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.51% | -5.96% | -27.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.76% | -7.61% | -20.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.18% | 3.62% | +6.56% |
Volatility
L4K3.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc (L4K3.DE) is 6.22%, while KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that L4K3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L4K3.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 7.38% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 13.49% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.44% | 18.68% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 22.48% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 22.48% | +4.45% |
L4K3.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
L4K3.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
L4K3.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither L4K3.DE nor CHIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
L4K3.DE and CHIN.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, L4K3.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
L4K3.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
L4K3.DE tracks MSCI China, while CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for L4K3.DE and 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for L4K3.DE and CHIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer