L4K3.DE vs. FLXC.DE
L4K3.DE (Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc) and FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - L4K3.DE tracks the MSCI China while FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, L4K3.DE returned -4.01%/yr vs -3.95%/yr for FLXC.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. L4K3.DE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.DE.
Performance
L4K3.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L4K3.DE achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly lower than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.
L4K3.DE
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -9.21%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- -4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -8.20%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
L4K3.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L4K3.DE Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc | -6.67% | 17.15% | 27.30% | -14.42% | -14.90% | -16.74% | 15.62% | 20.08% |
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -14.60% | 16.83% | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between L4K3.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between L4K3.DE and FLXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L4K3.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
L4K3.DE
FLXC.DE
L4K3.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc (L4K3.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| L4K3.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 0.31 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 0.64 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| L4K3.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 0.27 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | -0.15 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.09 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
L4K3.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L4K3.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXC.DE drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L4K3.DE and FLXC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L4K3.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.69% | -55.61% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.74% | -15.19% | -10.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.74% | -24.70% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.06% | -49.07% | +0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.32% | -30.89% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -27.95% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.28% | 7.38% | +7.90% |
Volatility
L4K3.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc (L4K3.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) at 6.78%. This indicates that L4K3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L4K3.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 6.78% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 12.35% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.86% | 17.78% | +10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.30% | 26.71% | +2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.03% | 26.20% | +1.83% |
L4K3.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
L4K3.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
L4K3.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither L4K3.DE nor FLXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, L4K3.DE and FLXC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for L4K3.DE.
L4K3.DE tracks MSCI China, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for L4K3.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
Find the right allocation for L4K3.DE and FLXC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer