PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
L.TO vs. TLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

L.TO vs. TLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Talen Energy Corporation (TLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

L.TO is traded in CAD, while TLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TLN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than TLN's 20.98% return.


L.TO

1D
-1.11%
1M
3.42%
YTD
2.62%
6M
2.89%
1Y
15.10%
3Y*
34.35%
5Y*
33.11%
10Y*
26.65%

TLN

1D
0.95%
1M
21.03%
YTD
20.98%
6M
18.86%
1Y
57.08%
3Y*
116.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L.TO vs. TLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
2.62%34.69%54.55%13.89%
TLN
Talen Energy Corporation
20.98%77.56%241.45%35.81%

Correlation

The correlation between L.TO and TLN is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2023

-0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

L.TO:

CA$74.67B

TLN:

$20.78B

EPS

L.TO:

CA$3.72

TLN:

-$0.44

PS Ratio

L.TO:

0.73

TLN:

6.92

PB Ratio

L.TO:

6.85

TLN:

19.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$64.25B

TLN:

$3.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$19.91B

TLN:

$1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$7.21B

TLN:

$326.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

L.TO vs. TLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L.TO
L.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
L.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
L.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
L.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
L.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TLN
TLN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L.TO vs. TLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Talen Energy Corporation (TLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


L.TOTLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.73

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

3.43

-1.00

L.TO vs. TLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the TLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L.TO and TLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

L.TO vs. TLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.67%, which is greater than TLN's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and TLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


L.TOTLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-33.57%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-33.10%

+18.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-33.57%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.06%

-0.17%

-7.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-7.51%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.22%

16.68%

-10.46%

Volatility

L.TO vs. TLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) is 6.47%, while Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) has a volatility of 16.14%. This indicates that L.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


L.TOTLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

16.14%

-9.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.19%

42.35%

-26.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.21%

57.50%

-36.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

50.44%

-31.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

50.44%

-30.05%

Dividends

L.TO vs. TLN - Dividend Comparison

L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while TLN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
0.91%2.19%4.20%5.43%5.28%5.40%8.15%7.40%6.45%7.84%7.27%7.61%
TLN
Talen Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

L.TO vs. TLN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loblaw Companies Limited and Talen Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
14.48B
1.13B
(L.TO) Total Revenue
(TLN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. L.TO values in CAD, TLN values in USD

L.TO vs. TLN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Loblaw Companies Limited and Talen Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
31.3%
0
Portfolio components
L.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.54B and revenue of 14.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

TLN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

L.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

TLN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 210.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

L.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 594.00M and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

TLN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Talen Energy Corporation reported a net income of 63.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


L.TO and TLN have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for L.TO and TLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer