L.TO vs. LEU
L.TO (Loblaw Companies Limited) and LEU (Centrus Energy Corp.) are both stocks. L.TO operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while LEU operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, L.TO returned 26.65%/yr vs 51.62%/yr for LEU. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
L.TO vs. LEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
L.TO is traded in CAD, while LEU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LEU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than LEU's -21.69% return. Over the past 10 years, L.TO has underperformed LEU with an annualized return of 26.65%, while LEU has yielded a comparatively higher 51.62% annualized return.
L.TO
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 15.10%
- 3Y*
- 34.35%
- 5Y*
- 33.11%
- 10Y*
- 26.65%
LEU
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- -21.69%
- 6M
- -27.71%
- 1Y
- 0.03%
- 3Y*
- 82.52%
- 5Y*
- 50.43%
- 10Y*
- 51.62%
L.TO vs. LEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 2.62% | 34.69% | 54.55% | 13.67% | 21.98% | 76.92% | 1.32% | 17.76% | 51.51% | 4.10% |
LEU Centrus Energy Corp. | -21.69% | 247.81% | 32.79% | 63.53% | -30.80% | 115.67% | 228.21% | 290.32% | -54.31% | -41.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between L.TO and LEU is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2006 | 0.03 |
The correlation between L.TO and LEU shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
L.TO:
CA$74.67B
LEU:
$4.12B
L.TO:
CA$3.72
LEU:
$2.89
L.TO:
17.05
LEU:
63.48
L.TO:
0.73
LEU:
8.50
L.TO:
6.85
LEU:
5.32
L.TO:
CA$64.25B
LEU:
$452.30M
L.TO:
CA$19.91B
LEU:
$116.10M
L.TO:
CA$7.21B
LEU:
$70.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L.TO vs. LEU — Risk / Return Rank
L.TO
LEU
L.TO vs. LEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| L.TO | LEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.08 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 0.00 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | 0.00 | +2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
L.TO vs. LEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.67%, smaller than the maximum LEU drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and LEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L.TO | LEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.67% | -99.98% | +55.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.53% | -66.59% | +52.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.53% | -66.59% | +52.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.53% | -77.53% | +63.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.54% | -83.63% | +65.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -96.45% | +88.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -81.83% | +74.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 40.17% | -33.95% |
Volatility
L.TO vs. LEU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) is 6.47%, while Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a volatility of 28.89%. This indicates that L.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L.TO | LEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 28.89% | -22.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.19% | 67.27% | -51.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.21% | 92.90% | -71.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 86.97% | -68.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 82.60% | -62.21% |
Dividends
L.TO vs. LEU - Dividend Comparison
L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 0.91% | 2.19% | 4.20% | 5.43% | 5.28% | 5.40% | 8.15% | 7.40% | 6.45% | 7.84% | 7.27% | 7.61% |
LEU Centrus Energy Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
L.TO vs. LEU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loblaw Companies Limited and Centrus Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
L.TO vs. LEU - Profitability Comparison
L.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.54B and revenue of 14.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
LEU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a gross profit of 31.50M and revenue of 76.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.
L.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
LEU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported an operating income of 800.00K and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
L.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 594.00M and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.
LEU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a net income of 10.00M and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
L.TO and LEU have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for L.TO and LEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer