PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KXI vs. ICLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KXI vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KXI achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 13.66% return. Over the past 10 years, KXI has underperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 5.59%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively higher 9.32% annualized return.


KXI

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.63%
6M
4.73%
YTD
6.75%
1Y
7.60%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
5.59%

ICLN

1D
-3.25%
1M
-10.73%
6M
6.35%
YTD
13.66%
1Y
40.77%
3Y*
1.53%
5Y*
-2.55%
10Y*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KXI vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
6.75%9.68%4.20%2.41%-6.02%13.71%7.69%23.40%-10.71%17.60%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
13.66%47.05%-25.72%-20.41%-5.43%-24.18%141.82%44.36%-9.03%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between KXI and ICLN is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008

0.46

The correlation between KXI and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KXI vs. ICLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KXI
ICLN

Consumer Defensive

97.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

30.2%

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

27.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

3.1%

Utilities

-

36.7%

Consumer Defensive

KXI
97.0%
ICLN

-

Consumer Cyclical

KXI
3.0%
ICLN
0.2%

Basic Materials

KXI

-

ICLN
1.4%

Communication Services

KXI

-

ICLN

-

Energy

KXI

-

ICLN
30.2%

Financial Services

KXI

-

ICLN
0.1%

Healthcare

KXI

-

ICLN

-

Industrials

KXI

-

ICLN
27.6%

Real Estate

KXI

-

ICLN

-

Technology

KXI

-

ICLN
3.1%

Utilities

KXI

-

ICLN
36.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KXI vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KXI
KXI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KXI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
KXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KXI vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KXIICLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

1.92

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

6.74

-5.23

KXI vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KXI and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KXI vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KXI drawdown since its inception was -42.27%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KXI and ICLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KXIICLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.27%

-87.15%

+44.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-21.37%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.92%

-43.18%

+31.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.45%

-57.16%

+39.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.59%

-66.75%

+42.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.18%

-49.15%

+42.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-66.47%

+61.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.04%

6.07%

-1.03%

Volatility

KXI vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) is 4.68%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 11.84%. This indicates that KXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KXIICLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

11.84%

-7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

24.34%

-14.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

29.50%

-17.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.60%

27.90%

-15.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.73%

27.40%

-13.67%

KXI vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

KXI vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

KXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than ICLN's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
0.99%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%
KXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
2.35%2.29%2.51%2.99%1.98%2.26%2.34%2.17%2.97%2.17%2.34%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


KXI and ICLN have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICLN has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to KXI (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KXI dropped -42.27% vs ICLN's -87.15%.

On 10-year performance, ICLN leads with 9.32% vs 5.59% for KXI. On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, KXI has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ICLN has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for KXI.

KXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.99% for ICLN.

KXI is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. KXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Staples Index, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for KXI and 0.39% for ICLN.

ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KXI and ICLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer