KWIN vs. KMLM
KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KWIN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Wahed Alternative Income Index, while KMLM is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWIN charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.
Performance
KWIN vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWIN achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 6.05% return.
KWIN
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMLM
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- -1.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- —
KWIN vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.30% | 0.61% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 6.05% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWIN and KMLM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWIN vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KMLM
KWIN vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWIN | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWIN vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWIN drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWIN and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWIN | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.93% | -27.47% | +26.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -17.31% | +17.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -12.77% | +12.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility
KWIN vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWIN | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31% | 11.39% | -8.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 14.58% | -11.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 14.69% | -11.38% |
KWIN vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWIN has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWIN vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.74% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWIN and KMLM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KWIN is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KWIN is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.
KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
KWIN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KMLM is Systematic Trend. KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index, while KMLM tracks KFA MLM Index. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for KWIN and 0.90% for KMLM.
Find the right allocation for KWIN and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer