KWIN vs. BNDD
KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KWIN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Wahed Alternative Income Index, while BNDD is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by KraneShares. KWIN is passively managed, while BNDD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. KWIN charges 0.51%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.
Performance
KWIN vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWIN achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 7.53% return.
KWIN
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- -4.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KWIN vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.30% | 0.61% |
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 7.53% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWIN and BNDD is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWIN vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNDD
KWIN vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWIN | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWIN vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWIN drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWIN and BNDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWIN | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.93% | -30.87% | +29.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -24.24% | +23.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -19.41% | +19.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.82% | — |
Volatility
KWIN vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWIN | BNDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31% | 10.48% | -7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 13.32% | -10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 13.32% | -10.01% |
KWIN vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWIN has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWIN vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison
KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BNDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF | 3.51% | 3.82% | 3.85% | 4.30% | 43.17% | 1.04% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWIN and BNDD have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KWIN is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KWIN is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.
BNDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
KWIN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BNDD is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for KWIN and 1.02% for BNDD.
Find the right allocation for KWIN and BNDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer