PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KWEB vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

KWEB vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KWEB returned 0.02%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for YCS. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWEB charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

KWEB vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWEB achieves a -20.06% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, KWEB has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 0.02%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.

KWEB

1D
-3.92%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
-20.06%
6M
-22.24%
1Y
-12.78%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
-14.28%
10Y*
0.02%

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KWEB vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF		-20.06%23.55%12.01%-9.06%-17.24%-49.01%58.23%29.92%-33.80%69.73%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between KWEB and YCS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2013

0.06

The correlation between KWEB and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

ProShares UltraShort Yen

Often compared with KWEB:
KWEB vs. CQQQKWEB vs. FXIKWEB vs. MCHIKWEB vs. KTECKWEB vs. CWEBKWEB vs. KLIPKWEB vs. YINN
Often compared with YCS:
YCS vs. YCLYCS vs. JPYUSD=XYCS vs. PFIXYCS vs. TBTYCS vs. UUPYCS vs. BCSFYCS vs. SPY

Return for Risk

KWEB vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KWEB
KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWEB vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

KWEBYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.47
1.92

-2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.52
2.44

-2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.35

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

3.97

-4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

12.40

-13.16

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KWEB vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWEB Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWEB and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

KWEBYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

1.92

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

1.12

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

0.65

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.33

-0.27

Drawdowns

KWEB vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and YCS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

KWEBYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.92%

-49.56%

-31.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.13%

-8.30%

-25.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.13%

-23.05%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.17%

-27.32%

-44.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.92%

-27.32%

-53.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.52%

0.00%

-68.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.24%

-19.93%

-15.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.85%

2.66%

+14.19%

Volatility

KWEB vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a higher volatility of 11.52% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that KWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

KWEBYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.52%

2.75%

+8.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.11%

12.32%

+7.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.25%

17.27%

+9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.67%

21.10%

+26.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.99%

19.01%

+20.98%

KWEB vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWEB has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

KWEB vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF		7.70%6.16%3.51%1.71%0.00%7.07%0.29%0.08%3.40%0.58%1.19%0.46%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

KWEB and YCS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KWEB has higher volatility (11.52%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KWEB dropped -80.92% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.34% vs 0.02% for KWEB. On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 0.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KWEB is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

KWEB is categorized as China Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: CICC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for KWEB and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KWEB and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer