KVLE vs. KMLM
KVLE (KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KVLE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KMLM is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KVLE returned 10.02%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for KMLM. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. KVLE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.
Performance
KVLE vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 5.59% return.
KVLE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- —
KMLM
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- 5.59%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- -1.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- —
KVLE vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 9.90% | 9.34% | 18.25% | 10.49% | -5.96% | 28.01% | 2.36% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 5.59% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between KVLE and KMLM is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | -0.08 |
The correlation between KVLE and KMLM shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (5 years) to 0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KVLE vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
KVLE
KMLM
KVLE vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KVLE | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.17 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.19 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | 4.46 | +2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KVLE vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KVLE | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -27.47% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -9.18% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.39% | -22.28% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -27.47% | +9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -17.67% | +16.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -12.76% | +9.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.44% | +0.07% |
Volatility
KVLE vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 3.12%. This indicates that KVLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KVLE | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 3.12% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 9.90% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 11.34% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 14.58% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 14.69% | -0.37% |
KVLE vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
KVLE vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than KMLM's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.76% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% | 0.00% |
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 7.32% | 7.90% | 7.99% | 2.53% | 5.78% | 9.51% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KVLE and KMLM have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KVLE has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to KMLM (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KVLE dropped -18.38% vs KMLM's -27.47%.
On 5-year performance, KVLE leads with 10.02% vs 4.07% for KMLM. On fees, KVLE is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, KMLM has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KVLE has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KVLE is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.
KVLE has the higher dividend yield at 7.32%, compared with 4.76% for KMLM.
KVLE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KMLM is Systematic Trend. KVLE tracks 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KMLM tracks KFA MLM Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for KVLE and 0.90% for KMLM.
KVLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KVLE and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer