PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KVLE vs. KEAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KVLE vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KVLE vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KVLE
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF
-2.01%9.34%12.85%
KEAT
Keating Active ETF
11.91%22.76%2.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than KEAT's 11.91% return.


KVLE

1D
0.24%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
-2.01%
6M
-3.49%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*

KEAT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
11.91%
6M
15.74%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KVLE vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KVLE vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KVLE
KVLE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
KVLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KVLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
KVLE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
KVLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
KVLE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

KEAT
KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KVLE vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KVLEKEATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

2.49

-1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.90

3.22

-2.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.48

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

4.02

-3.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

16.77

-13.77

KVLE vs. KEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KVLE Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the KEAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KVLE and KEAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KVLEKEATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

2.49

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.79

-1.06

Correlation

The correlation between KVLE and KEAT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KVLE vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison

KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than KEAT's 2.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
KVLE
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF
8.21%7.90%7.99%2.53%5.78%9.51%0.35%
KEAT
Keating Active ETF
2.37%2.48%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

KVLE vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and KEAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KVLEKEATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-7.45%

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-7.38%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.37%

-3.46%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-1.38%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.77%

+1.16%

Volatility

KVLE vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison

KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Keating Active ETF (KEAT) at 2.97%. This indicates that KVLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KVLEKEATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

2.97%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

8.67%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

12.06%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

10.39%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.44%

10.39%

+4.05%