KURE vs. OBOR
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR).
KURE and OBOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KURE is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2018. OBOR is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure. It was launched on Sep 7, 2017. Both KURE and OBOR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KURE vs. OBOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KURE vs. OBOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 0.18% | 24.87% | -17.83% | -17.70% | -25.43% | -16.01% | 68.97% | 34.30% | -30.07% |
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | 3.18% | 27.86% | 8.55% | -7.91% | -21.96% | 17.06% | 13.47% | 16.75% | -20.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KURE achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than OBOR's 3.18% return.
KURE
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -15.23%
- 1Y
- 13.79%
- 3Y*
- -4.11%
- 5Y*
- -12.05%
- 10Y*
- —
OBOR
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KURE vs. OBOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than OBOR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KURE vs. OBOR — Risk / Return Rank
KURE
OBOR
KURE vs. OBOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KURE | OBOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 1.85 | -1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 2.42 | -1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.37 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 2.79 | -2.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.31 | 10.05 | -8.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KURE | OBOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.85 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | 0.13 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.21 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between KURE and OBOR is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KURE vs. OBOR - Dividend Comparison
KURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than OBOR's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 4.19% | 4.19% | 1.29% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | 1.88% | 1.94% | 3.87% | 3.40% | 4.75% | 3.26% | 2.04% | 4.33% | 0.02% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
KURE vs. OBOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KURE drawdown since its inception was -68.53%, which is greater than OBOR's maximum drawdown of -41.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KURE and OBOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KURE | OBOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.53% | -41.54% | -26.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.72% | -10.47% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.94% | -34.00% | -33.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.38% | -8.96% | -47.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.67% | -16.16% | -21.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.71% | 2.91% | +7.80% |
Volatility
KURE vs. OBOR - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) at 6.59%. This indicates that KURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OBOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KURE | OBOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.06% | 6.59% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.78% | 12.08% | +5.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.85% | 15.86% | +12.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.89% | 15.78% | +16.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.52% | 18.46% | +14.06% |