KURE vs. IVOL
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL).
KURE and IVOL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KURE is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2018. IVOL is an actively managed fund by CICC. It was launched on May 13, 2019.
Performance
KURE vs. IVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KURE vs. IVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 0.18% | 24.87% | -17.83% | -17.70% | -25.43% | -16.01% | 68.97% | 13.71% |
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -1.46% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -5.18% | -12.69% | -0.31% | 14.56% | 3.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KURE achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than IVOL's -1.46% return.
KURE
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -15.23%
- 1Y
- 13.79%
- 3Y*
- -4.11%
- 5Y*
- -12.05%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- -2.83%
- 5Y*
- -4.62%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KURE vs. IVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOL's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KURE vs. IVOL — Risk / Return Rank
KURE
IVOL
KURE vs. IVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KURE | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 0.64 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.08 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 0.55 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.31 | 1.06 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KURE | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | -0.36 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | -0.05 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between KURE and IVOL is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KURE vs. IVOL - Dividend Comparison
KURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than IVOL's 3.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 4.19% | 4.19% | 1.29% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% |
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.73% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KURE vs. IVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KURE drawdown since its inception was -68.53%, which is greater than IVOL's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KURE and IVOL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KURE | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.53% | -31.16% | -37.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.72% | -6.72% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.94% | -31.16% | -36.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.38% | -22.51% | -33.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.67% | -13.02% | -24.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.71% | 3.50% | +7.21% |
Volatility
KURE vs. IVOL - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) at 2.34%. This indicates that KURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KURE | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.06% | 2.34% | +6.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.78% | 4.41% | +13.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.85% | 10.40% | +18.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.89% | 12.82% | +19.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.52% | 12.11% | +20.41% |