PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KTEC vs. CXSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KTEC vs. CXSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -11.17% return, which is significantly lower than CXSE's 0.93% return.


KTEC

1D
-3.20%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
-11.17%
6M
-12.80%
1Y
-8.17%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
10Y*

CXSE

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.93%
6M
0.61%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
-8.07%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTEC vs. CXSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
-11.17%21.01%16.13%-10.41%-26.12%-29.50%
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
0.93%37.00%8.56%-18.02%-29.32%-23.25%

Correlation

The correlation between KTEC and CXSE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021

0.92

The correlation between KTEC and CXSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

KTEC vs. CXSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KTEC
CXSE

Consumer Cyclical

48.6%
26.2%

Communication Services

27.6%
10.1%

Technology

21.3%
22.6%

Healthcare

2.5%
8.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Energy

-

0.4%

Financial Services

-

6.2%

Industrials

-

16.6%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

KTEC
48.6%
CXSE
26.2%

Communication Services

KTEC
27.6%
CXSE
10.1%

Technology

KTEC
21.3%
CXSE
22.6%

Healthcare

KTEC
2.5%
CXSE
8.8%

Basic Materials

KTEC

-

CXSE
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

KTEC

-

CXSE
3.9%

Energy

KTEC

-

CXSE
0.4%

Financial Services

KTEC

-

CXSE
6.2%

Industrials

KTEC

-

CXSE
16.6%

Real Estate

KTEC

-

CXSE
0.9%

Utilities

KTEC

-

CXSE
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KTEC vs. CXSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTEC
KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTEC vs. CXSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KTECCXSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.21

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

1.38

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

2.90

-3.40

KTEC vs. CXSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the CXSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTEC and CXSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KTECCXSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

1.14

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.19

-0.43

Drawdowns

KTEC vs. CXSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, roughly equal to the maximum CXSE drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and CXSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTECCXSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.90%

-70.01%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.36%

-17.70%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

-32.12%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.95%

-46.01%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.97%

-27.83%

-16.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.26%

8.42%

+7.84%

Volatility

KTEC vs. CXSE - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) at 7.29%. This indicates that KTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTECCXSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.62%

7.29%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

14.54%

+6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.01%

21.39%

+6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.22%

32.30%

+10.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.22%

28.70%

+14.52%

KTEC vs. CXSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CXSE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

KTEC vs. CXSE - Dividend Comparison

KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than CXSE's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.99%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
3.78%3.36%0.27%0.81%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KTEC and CXSE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KTEC has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to CXSE (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs CXSE's -70.01%.

On 3-year performance, CXSE leads with 10.95% vs 7.14% for KTEC. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, CXSE has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 10.95% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 1.99% for CXSE.

KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 0.32% for CXSE.

CXSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KTEC and CXSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer