KTEC vs. CN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds - KTEC tracks the Hang Seng Tech Index while CN tracks the MSCI China All Shares. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KTEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

KTEC vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KTEC

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -1.75%
• 6M: -25.13%
• YTD: -17.62%
• 1Y: -15.81%
• 3Y*: 1.41%
• 5Y*: -10.84%
• 10Y*: —

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTEC vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-17.62%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	-26.12%	-29.98%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-14.55%

Correlation

The correlation between KTEC and CN is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021	0.68

The correlation between KTEC and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KTEC vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KTEC	CN
Consumer Cyclical	35.3%	5.4%
Technology	35.3%	0.3%
Communication Services	18.0%	0.4%
Industrials	8.3%	1.0%
Healthcare	1.9%	0.8%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.3%
Energy	-	0.9%
Financial Services	-	55.1%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

KTEC vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTEC vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KTEC	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.68	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KTEC	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.02%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.03%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KTEC	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.05%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.14%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.89%	—	—

KTEC vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KTEC vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.07%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KTEC and CN in my portfolio?

KTEC and CN have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KTEC or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KTEC or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KTEC or CN?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between KTEC and CN?

KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 0.50% for CN.