KT vs. G

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

KT (KT Corporation) and G (Genpact Limited) are both stocks. KT operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while G operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, KT returned 5.49%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for G. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KT vs. G - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KT Corporation (KT) and Genpact Limited (G). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KT achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly higher than G's -39.27% return. Over the past 10 years, KT has outperformed G with an annualized return of 5.49%, while G has yielded a comparatively lower 1.86% annualized return.

KT

• 1D: -2.57%
• 1M: -2.57%
• YTD: -5.10%
• 6M: -3.32%
• 1Y: -7.08%
• 3Y*: 21.22%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 5.49%

G

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -11.40%
• YTD: -39.27%
• 6M: -41.42%
• 1Y: -29.57%
• 3Y*: -7.05%
• 5Y*: -7.68%
• 10Y*: 1.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KT vs. G - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KT KT Corporation	-5.10%	27.73%	19.93%	5.01%	13.34%	21.00%	-5.09%	-18.42%	-8.90%	10.79%
G Genpact Limited	-39.27%	10.56%	25.78%	-23.98%	-11.74%	29.51%	-0.93%	57.66%	-14.12%	31.54%

Correlation

The correlation between KT and G is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2007	0.23

The correlation between KT and G shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap KT : $9.92B G : $4.86B
EPS KT : ₩3.14K G : $3.25
PE Ratio KT : 8.72 G : 8.65
PEG Ratio KT : 0.19 G : 0.49
PS Ratio KT : 0.48 G : 0.95
PB Ratio KT : 0.85 G : 1.96
Total Revenue (TTM) KT : ₩28.39T G : $5.16B
Gross Profit (TTM) KT : ₩15.90T G : $1.87B
EBITDA (TTM) KT : ₩5.41T G : $844.98M

Return for Risk

KT vs. G — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KT

KT Risk / Return Rank: 28
KT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
KT Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KT Omega Ratio Rank: 25
KT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
KT Martin Ratio Rank: 31

G

G Risk / Return Rank: 9
G Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
G Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
G Omega Ratio Rank: 10
G Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
G Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KT vs. G - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KT Corporation (KT) and Genpact Limited (G). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KT	G	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	-0.84	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	-1.17	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.85	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	-0.72	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	-1.67	+1.04

KT vs. G - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KT Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is higher than the G Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KT and G, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KT vs. G - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KT drawdown since its inception was -85.64%, which is greater than G's maximum drawdown of -64.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KT and G.

Drawdown Indicators

	KT	G	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.64%	-64.14%	-21.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.30%	-41.42%	+14.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.30%	-48.07%	+20.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.30%	-48.07%	+20.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.03%	-49.47%	-14.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.54%	-48.07%	-2.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.87%	-15.56%	-50.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.27%	17.74%	-6.47%

Volatility

KT vs. G - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KT Corporation (KT) is 7.41%, while Genpact Limited (G) has a volatility of 11.70%. This indicates that KT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KT	G	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.41%	11.70%	-4.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.18%	28.06%	-10.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.30%	35.57%	-13.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.63%	28.89%	-6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.36%	28.26%	-4.90%

Dividends

KT vs. G - Dividend Comparison

KT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than G's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
G Genpact Limited	2.54%	1.45%	1.42%	1.58%	1.08%	0.81%	0.94%	0.81%	1.11%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%
KT KT Corporation	3.49%	4.24%	3.50%	5.29%	5.40%	6.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.49%	1.84%

Financials

KT vs. G - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KT Corporation and Genpact Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

G - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported a gross profit of 471.67M and revenue of 1.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.

KT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

G - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported an operating income of 198.58M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

KT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

G - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported a net income of 147.99M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KT and G in my portfolio?

KT and G have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KT or G?

G has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to KT (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KT dropped -85.64% vs G's -64.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.