KT vs. TM
KT (KT Corporation) and TM (Toyota Motor Corporation) are both stocks. KT operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while TM operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, KT returned 5.49%/yr vs 7.86%/yr for TM. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KT vs. TM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KT achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly higher than TM's -20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, KT has underperformed TM with an annualized return of 5.49%, while TM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.86% annualized return.
KT
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- -7.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 5.49%
TM
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -10.23%
- YTD
- -20.71%
- 6M
- -22.68%
- 1Y
- -0.09%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
KT vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KT KT Corporation | -5.10% | 27.73% | 19.93% | 5.01% | 13.34% | 21.00% | -5.09% | -18.42% | -8.90% | 10.79% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | -20.71% | 13.82% | 8.88% | 38.23% | -24.43% | 23.21% | 13.62% | 22.69% | -5.81% | 12.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between KT and TM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1999 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
KT:
$9.92B
TM:
$221.22B
KT:
₩3.14K
TM:
¥2.98K
KT:
8.72
TM:
9.19
KT:
0.19
TM:
0.48
KT:
0.48
TM:
0.70
KT:
0.85
TM:
0.89
KT:
₩28.39T
TM:
¥51.16T
KT:
₩15.90T
TM:
¥8.54T
KT:
₩5.41T
TM:
¥7.11T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KT vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank
KT
TM
KT vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KT Corporation (KT) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KT | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.03 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | -0.00 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | -0.01 | -0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KT vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KT drawdown since its inception was -85.64%, which is greater than TM's maximum drawdown of -60.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KT and TM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KT | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.64% | -60.15% | -25.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.30% | -31.64% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.30% | -34.92% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.30% | -36.80% | +9.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.03% | -36.80% | -27.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.54% | -31.64% | -18.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.87% | -22.17% | -43.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.27% | 12.07% | -0.80% |
Volatility
KT vs. TM - Volatility Comparison
KT Corporation (KT) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) have volatilities of 7.41% and 7.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KT | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 7.28% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.18% | 20.52% | -3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.30% | 29.49% | -7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 26.95% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.36% | 23.66% | -0.30% |
Dividends
KT vs. TM - Dividend Comparison
KT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than TM's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KT KT Corporation | 3.49% | 4.24% | 3.50% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 6.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.49% | 1.84% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | 1.69% | 2.95% | 2.81% | 2.45% | 2.90% | 2.45% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 3.40% | 2.96% | 3.23% | 5.59% |
Financials
KT vs. TM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KT Corporation and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KT vs. TM - Profitability Comparison
KT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
TM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.
KT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
TM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
KT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
TM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KT and TM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KT has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to TM (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KT dropped -85.64% vs TM's -60.15%.
TM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KT and TM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer