KSTR vs. KOID

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) and KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KSTR is a China Equities fund tracking the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index, while KOID is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KSTR returned 108.49% vs 46.79% for KOID. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KSTR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KOID.

Performance

KSTR vs. KOID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSTR achieves a 52.98% return, which is significantly higher than KOID's 19.88% return.

KSTR

• 1D: -5.54%
• 1M: 17.74%
• 6M: 33.72%
• YTD: 52.98%
• 1Y: 108.49%
• 3Y*: 24.92%
• 5Y*: 1.09%
• 10Y*: —

KOID

• 1D: -4.53%
• 1M: -6.44%
• 6M: 12.59%
• YTD: 19.88%
• 1Y: 46.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSTR vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	52.98%	37.04%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	19.88%	27.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KSTR and KOID is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.60

The correlation between KSTR and KOID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

KSTR vs. KOID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KSTR	KOID
Technology	86.3%	44.5%
Industrials	6.6%	30.8%
Healthcare	5.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	18.4%
Energy	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	5.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KSTR vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR

KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 90
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

KOID

KOID Risk / Return Rank: 62
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 60
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSTR vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KSTR	KOID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	1.71	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	2.29	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.29	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.16	2.58	+3.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.79	8.16	+6.64

KSTR vs. KOID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the KOID Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSTR and KOID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KSTR vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSTR drawdown since its inception was -66.46%, which is greater than KOID's maximum drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR and KOID.

Drawdown Indicators

	KSTR	KOID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.46%	-18.19%	-48.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-18.19%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.99%	-11.74%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.15%	-3.61%	-34.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.36%	5.75%	+1.61%

Volatility

KSTR vs. KOID - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) has a higher volatility of 20.33% compared to KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) at 12.96%. This indicates that KSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KOID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KSTR	KOID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.33%	12.96%	+7.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.29%	23.10%	+10.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.01%	27.58%	+13.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.31%	26.98%	+12.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.44%	26.98%	+11.46%

KSTR vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSTR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than KOID's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

KSTR vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison

KSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.

Position	TTM	2025
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	0.71%	0.85%
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KSTR and KOID in my portfolio?

KSTR and KOID have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KSTR or KOID?

KSTR has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to KOID (12.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSTR dropped -66.46% vs KOID's -18.19%.

Which ETF is better, KSTR or KOID?

On 1-year performance, KSTR leads with 108.49% vs 46.79% for KOID. On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KOID has been the lower-risk option at 12.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KSTR or KOID?

Over the 1-year period, KSTR has performed better with a 108.49% return vs 46.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KSTR or KOID?

KOID is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KSTR or KOID?

KOID has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for KSTR.

What is the main difference between KSTR and KOID?

KSTR is categorized as China Equities, while KOID is Technology Equities. KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index, while KOID tracks MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KSTR and 0.69% for KOID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.