KSTR vs. KJD
KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) and KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) are both China Equities funds from KraneShares. KSTR is passively managed, while KJD is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KSTR charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for KJD.
Performance
KSTR vs. KJD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSTR achieves a 52.98% return, which is significantly higher than KJD's -3.67% return.
KSTR
- 1D
- -5.54%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- 6M
- 33.72%
- YTD
- 52.98%
- 1Y
- 108.49%
- 3Y*
- 24.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- —
KJD
- 1D
- 4.68%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- 6M
- -15.61%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KSTR vs. KJD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | 52.98% | -2.31% |
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | -3.67% | -28.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSTR and KJD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSTR vs. KJD — Risk / Return Rank
KSTR
KJD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KSTR vs. KJD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KSTR | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.79 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KSTR vs. KJD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSTR drawdown since its inception was -66.46%, which is greater than KJD's maximum drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR and KJD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSTR | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.46% | -50.81% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.99% | -35.66% | +23.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.15% | -30.28% | -7.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.36% | — | — |
Volatility
KSTR vs. KJD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSTR | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.01% | 61.63% | -20.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.31% | 61.63% | -22.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.44% | 61.63% | -23.19% |
KSTR vs. KJD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSTR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than KJD's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
KSTR vs. KJD - Dividend Comparison
Neither KSTR nor KJD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KSTR and KJD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KSTR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KSTR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.
KSTR and KJD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KSTR and 1.26% for KJD.
Find the right allocation for KSTR and KJD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer