KSTR vs. ISVBF
KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) and ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - KSTR tracks the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index while ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KSTR returned -0.02%/yr vs -5.62%/yr for ISVBF. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KSTR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ISVBF.
Performance
KSTR vs. ISVBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSTR achieves a 34.18% return, which is significantly higher than ISVBF's -8.72% return.
KSTR
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 34.18%
- 6M
- 38.49%
- 1Y
- 83.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- -0.02%
- 10Y*
- —
ISVBF
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 6M
- -10.61%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- -5.62%
- 10Y*
- —
KSTR vs. ISVBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | 34.18% | 42.82% | 6.12% | -17.93% | -38.51% | 8.42% |
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | -8.72% | 30.64% | 18.96% | -9.28% | -23.01% | -22.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSTR and ISVBF is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021 | 0.22 |
The correlation between KSTR and ISVBF shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSTR vs. ISVBF — Risk / Return Rank
KSTR
ISVBF
KSTR vs. ISVBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KSTR | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.04 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.76 | 0.15 | +4.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | 0.34 | +11.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KSTR | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 0.09 | +2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | -0.19 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -0.17 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
KSTR vs. ISVBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSTR drawdown since its inception was -66.46%, which is greater than ISVBF's maximum drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR and ISVBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSTR | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.46% | -53.78% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -19.18% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.55% | -23.77% | -17.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.46% | -53.22% | -13.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.15% | -26.01% | +15.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.75% | -32.76% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 8.28% | -1.30% |
Volatility
KSTR vs. ISVBF - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) has a higher volatility of 15.15% compared to iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) at 11.06%. This indicates that KSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISVBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSTR | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.15% | 11.06% | +4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.14% | 26.63% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.48% | 30.67% | +4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.30% | 30.21% | +8.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.67% | 30.21% | +7.46% |
KSTR vs. ISVBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSTR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ISVBF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
KSTR vs. ISVBF - Dividend Comparison
Neither KSTR nor ISVBF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KSTR and ISVBF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KSTR has higher volatility (15.15%) compared to ISVBF (11.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSTR dropped -66.46% vs ISVBF's -53.78%.
On 5-year performance, KSTR leads with -0.02% vs -5.62% for ISVBF. On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ISVBF has been the lower-risk option at 11.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KSTR has performed better with a -0.02% return vs -5.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.
KSTR and ISVBF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index, while ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KSTR and 0.40% for ISVBF.
KSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KSTR and ISVBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer