KSI.TO vs. CRDO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

KSI.TO (kneat.com, inc.) and CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. KSI.TO operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while CRDO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, KSI.TO returned 34.28%/yr vs 146.63%/yr for CRDO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KSI.TO vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in kneat.com, inc. (KSI.TO) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

KSI.TO is traded in CAD, while CRDO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRDO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSI.TO achieves a 30.89% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 78.03% return.

KSI.TO

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 26.52%
• YTD: 30.89%
• 6M: 46.36%
• 1Y: -2.42%
• 3Y*: 34.28%
• 5Y*: 16.90%
• 10Y*: —

CRDO

• 1D: -5.00%
• 1M: 35.25%
• YTD: 78.03%
• 6M: 76.96%
• 1Y: 245.31%
• 3Y*: 146.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSI.TO vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
KSI.TO kneat.com, inc.	30.89%	-16.04%	92.13%	14.23%	-14.42%
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd	78.03%	104.32%	274.43%	42.80%	17.76%

Correlation

The correlation between KSI.TO and CRDO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022	0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap KSI.TO : CA$616.94M CRDO : $48.33B
EPS KSI.TO : -CA$0.09 CRDO : $2.50
PS Ratio KSI.TO : 9.23 CRDO : 35.55
PB Ratio KSI.TO : 9.78 CRDO : 23.42
Total Revenue (TTM) KSI.TO : CA$66.52M CRDO : $1.34B
Gross Profit (TTM) KSI.TO : CA$39.98M CRDO : $908.35M
EBITDA (TTM) KSI.TO : CA$12.62M CRDO : $463.79M

Return for Risk

KSI.TO vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSI.TO

KSI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 40
KSI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
KSI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
KSI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
KSI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
KSI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CRDO

CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 90
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSI.TO vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for kneat.com, inc. (KSI.TO) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KSI.TO	CRDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	2.89	-2.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	3.00	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.36	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	4.59	-4.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.09	10.89	-10.98

KSI.TO vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSI.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSI.TO and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KSI.TO vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSI.TO drawdown since its inception was -59.87%, roughly equal to the maximum CRDO drawdown of -61.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSI.TO and CRDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KSI.TO	CRDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.87%	-61.76%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.15%	-53.82%	+3.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.91%	-61.76%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.06%	-5.00%	-5.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.68%	-18.92%	-3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.59%	22.63%	+4.96%

Volatility

KSI.TO vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for kneat.com, inc. (KSI.TO) is 17.82%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 28.16%. This indicates that KSI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KSI.TO	CRDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.82%	28.16%	-10.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.81%	64.97%	-30.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.43%	85.44%	-38.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.90%	81.82%	-35.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.19%	81.82%	-23.63%

Dividends

KSI.TO vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

Neither KSI.TO nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KSI.TO vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between kneat.com, inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KSI.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, kneat.com, inc. reported a gross profit of 10.21M and revenue of 18.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

KSI.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, kneat.com, inc. reported an operating income of -2.33M and revenue of 18.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

KSI.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, kneat.com, inc. reported a net income of -3.95M and revenue of 18.00M, resulting in a net margin of -21.9%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KSI.TO and CRDO in my portfolio?

KSI.TO and CRDO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.