PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSEP vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSEP vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSEP achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.


KSEP

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.51%
YTD
9.93%
6M
8.92%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.37%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSEP vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KSEP and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSEP vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSEP
KSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
KSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
KSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSEP vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KSEPRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

2.13

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

7.82

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.34

42.95

-26.61

KSEP vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSEP and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KSEP vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSEP drawdown since its inception was -14.92%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSEP and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSEPRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-0.52%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-0.52%

-4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.50%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-0.07%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

0.10%

+1.21%

Volatility

KSEP vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that KSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSEPRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

0.36%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

0.85%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

0.95%

+9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

1.07%

+10.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.61%

1.07%

+10.54%

KSEP vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSEP vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

KSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KSEP and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KSEP has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSEP dropped -14.92% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

On 1-year performance, KSEP leads with 21.29% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KSEP has performed better with a 21.29% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KSEP.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.00% for KSEP.

KSEP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KSEP and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSEP and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer