PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSA vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSA vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSA achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than SPEM's 12.45% return. Over the past 10 years, KSA has underperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 7.46%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.


KSA

1D
-1.27%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
4.97%
6M
4.43%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
0.52%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
7.46%

SPEM

1D
-1.40%
1M
3.20%
YTD
12.45%
6M
14.11%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSA vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
4.97%-8.20%-0.19%15.05%-6.06%33.62%2.65%9.30%13.07%6.14%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
12.45%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between KSA and SPEM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2015

0.44

KSA vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KSA
SPEM

Financial Services

39.7%
20.2%

Basic Materials

13.3%
8.2%

Energy

13.0%
4.7%

Communication Services

8.2%
7.2%

Utilities

4.6%
2.8%

Industrials

4.4%
8.5%

Healthcare

4.3%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.9%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
10.4%

Technology

2.2%
28.2%

Financial Services

KSA
39.7%
SPEM
20.2%

Basic Materials

KSA
13.3%
SPEM
8.2%

Energy

KSA
13.0%
SPEM
4.7%

Communication Services

KSA
8.2%
SPEM
7.2%

Utilities

KSA
4.6%
SPEM
2.8%

Industrials

KSA
4.4%
SPEM
8.5%

Healthcare

KSA
4.3%
SPEM
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

KSA
3.8%
SPEM
3.9%

Real Estate

KSA
3.5%
SPEM
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

KSA
2.3%
SPEM
10.4%

Technology

KSA
2.2%
SPEM
28.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSA vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSA
KSA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
KSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSA vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KSASPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.36

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

2.77

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

10.14

-9.45

KSA vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSA and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KSASPEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

1.98

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.33

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.50

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.23

+0.07

Drawdowns

KSA vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSA drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSA and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSASPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-64.41%

+23.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-11.36%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-17.62%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-31.88%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-36.06%

-4.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.69%

-1.40%

-15.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-14.75%

+3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

3.10%

+2.08%

Volatility

KSA vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) is 3.70%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that KSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSASPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

5.69%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

13.29%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

15.92%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

17.13%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

18.80%

+1.24%

KSA vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSA has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSA vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

KSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than SPEM's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
2.81%2.95%3.44%2.44%1.93%1.58%1.76%2.15%2.51%2.30%3.05%0.04%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.47%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


KSA and SPEM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to KSA (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSA dropped -40.56% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 9.45% vs 7.46% for KSA. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, KSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 9.45% return vs 7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KSA.

KSA has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.47% for SPEM.

KSA tracks MSCI Saudi Arabia Investable Market Index (IMI) 25/50 Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for KSA and 0.11% for SPEM.

SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSA and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer