PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSA vs. FLSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSA vs. FLSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KSA having a 6.80% return and FLSA slightly lower at 6.48%.


KSA

1D
-0.78%
1M
0.64%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.39%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
0.98%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
7.59%

FLSA

1D
-1.08%
1M
0.32%
YTD
6.48%
6M
5.88%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
0.89%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSA vs. FLSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
6.80%-8.20%-0.19%15.05%-6.06%33.62%2.65%9.30%2.37%
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
6.48%-7.15%-0.29%12.99%-3.58%35.72%3.73%9.46%2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between KSA and FLSA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2018

0.92

The correlation between KSA and FLSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

KSA vs. FLSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KSA
FLSA

Financial Services

40.5%
40.5%

Basic Materials

13.5%
15.8%

Energy

13.3%
13.9%

Communication Services

8.3%
9.4%

Healthcare

4.7%
3.5%

Utilities

4.3%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.5%

Industrials

3.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.9%

Technology

1.6%
1.3%

Financial Services

KSA
40.5%
FLSA
40.5%

Basic Materials

KSA
13.5%
FLSA
15.8%

Energy

KSA
13.3%
FLSA
13.9%

Communication Services

KSA
8.3%
FLSA
9.4%

Healthcare

KSA
4.7%
FLSA
3.5%

Utilities

KSA
4.3%
FLSA
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

KSA
4.2%
FLSA
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

KSA
3.7%
FLSA
2.5%

Industrials

KSA
3.5%
FLSA
3.0%

Real Estate

KSA
2.4%
FLSA
1.9%

Technology

KSA
1.6%
FLSA
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSA vs. FLSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSA
KSA Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
KSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
KSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSA
FLSA Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FLSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSA vs. FLSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KSAFLSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.10

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

0.69

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

1.52

-0.06

KSA vs. FLSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is comparable to the FLSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSA and FLSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KSA vs. FLSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSA drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than FLSA's maximum drawdown of -38.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSA and FLSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSAFLSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-38.31%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-11.30%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-14.95%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-27.25%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.24%

-14.70%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.45%

-12.21%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

5.12%

+0.13%

Volatility

KSA vs. FLSA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) have volatilities of 5.14% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSAFLSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.96%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.66%

12.52%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.57%

16.40%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

15.80%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

19.39%

+0.69%

KSA vs. FLSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSA has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSA's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSA vs. FLSA - Dividend Comparison

KSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than FLSA's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
1.22%4.01%3.01%3.09%1.90%1.95%2.16%3.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
2.70%2.95%3.44%2.44%1.93%1.58%1.76%2.15%2.51%2.30%3.05%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, KSA and FLSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KSA has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to FLSA (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSA dropped -40.56% vs FLSA's -38.31%.

On 5-year performance, FLSA leads with 2.81% vs 2.14% for KSA. On fees, FLSA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FLSA has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLSA has performed better with a 2.81% return vs 2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLSA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KSA.

KSA has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.22% for FLSA.

KSA tracks MSCI Saudi Arabia Investable Market Index (IMI) 25/50 Index, while FLSA tracks FTSE Saudi Arabia RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for KSA and 0.39% for FLSA.

FLSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSA and FLSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer