PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSA vs. ROAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSA vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSA achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 26.83% return. Over the past 10 years, KSA has underperformed ROAM with an annualized return of 7.46%, while ROAM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.


KSA

1D
-1.27%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
4.97%
6M
4.43%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
0.52%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
7.46%

ROAM

1D
-1.60%
1M
8.68%
YTD
26.83%
6M
28.99%
1Y
51.96%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSA vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
4.97%-8.20%-0.19%15.05%-6.06%33.62%2.65%9.30%13.07%6.14%
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
26.83%32.08%6.21%21.28%-14.78%9.32%2.24%8.89%-12.24%27.69%

Correlation

The correlation between KSA and ROAM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2015

0.41

KSA vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KSA
ROAM

Financial Services

39.7%
19.3%

Basic Materials

13.3%
4.1%

Energy

13.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

8.2%
6.0%

Utilities

4.6%
2.3%

Industrials

4.4%
5.6%

Healthcare

4.3%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.8%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
7.6%

Technology

2.2%
39.4%

Financial Services

KSA
39.7%
ROAM
19.3%

Basic Materials

KSA
13.3%
ROAM
4.1%

Energy

KSA
13.0%
ROAM
5.3%

Communication Services

KSA
8.2%
ROAM
6.0%

Utilities

KSA
4.6%
ROAM
2.3%

Industrials

KSA
4.4%
ROAM
5.6%

Healthcare

KSA
4.3%
ROAM
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

KSA
3.8%
ROAM
4.8%

Real Estate

KSA
3.5%
ROAM
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

KSA
2.3%
ROAM
7.6%

Technology

KSA
2.2%
ROAM
39.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSA vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSA
KSA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
KSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ROAM
ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSA vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KSAROAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.63

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

5.27

-4.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

19.91

-19.22

KSA vs. ROAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the ROAM Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSA and ROAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KSAROAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

3.50

-3.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.81

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.55

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.38

-0.08

Drawdowns

KSA vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSA drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum ROAM drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSA and ROAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSAROAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-45.47%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-9.92%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-16.79%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-27.07%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-45.47%

+4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.69%

-1.60%

-15.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-11.13%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

2.62%

+2.56%

Volatility

KSA vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) is 3.70%, while Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that KSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSAROAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

6.41%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

12.76%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

14.93%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

15.23%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

17.87%

+2.17%

KSA vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSA has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSA vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison

KSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than ROAM's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
2.81%2.95%3.44%2.44%1.93%1.58%1.76%2.15%2.51%2.30%3.05%0.04%
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.50%3.17%4.15%5.40%5.23%4.22%3.04%3.55%2.54%1.84%1.89%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


KSA and ROAM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROAM has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to KSA (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSA dropped -40.56% vs ROAM's -45.47%.

On 10-year performance, ROAM leads with 9.87% vs 7.46% for KSA. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, KSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KSA.

KSA has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.50% for ROAM.

KSA tracks MSCI Saudi Arabia Investable Market Index (IMI) 25/50 Index, while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for KSA and 0.44% for ROAM.

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSA and ROAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer