PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSA vs. BRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSA vs. BRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KSA having a 4.97% return and BRF slightly higher at 5.08%. Over the past 10 years, KSA has outperformed BRF with an annualized return of 7.46%, while BRF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.61% annualized return.


KSA

1D
-1.27%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
4.97%
6M
4.43%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
0.52%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
7.46%

BRF

1D
-4.64%
1M
-10.08%
YTD
5.08%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
-3.39%
10Y*
6.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSA vs. BRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
4.97%-8.20%-0.19%15.05%-6.06%33.62%2.65%9.30%13.07%6.14%
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.08%54.17%-35.02%37.21%-14.38%-20.40%-21.07%40.66%-12.07%54.63%

Correlation

The correlation between KSA and BRF is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2015

0.30

KSA vs. BRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KSA
BRF

Financial Services

39.7%
8.9%

Basic Materials

13.3%
12.9%

Energy

13.0%
5.7%

Communication Services

8.2%

-

Utilities

4.6%
9.4%

Industrials

4.4%
13.5%

Healthcare

4.3%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
10.3%

Real Estate

3.5%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
14.2%

Technology

2.2%
4.0%

Financial Services

KSA
39.7%
BRF
8.9%

Basic Materials

KSA
13.3%
BRF
12.9%

Energy

KSA
13.0%
BRF
5.7%

Communication Services

KSA
8.2%
BRF

-

Utilities

KSA
4.6%
BRF
9.4%

Industrials

KSA
4.4%
BRF
13.5%

Healthcare

KSA
4.3%
BRF
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

KSA
3.8%
BRF
10.3%

Real Estate

KSA
3.5%
BRF
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

KSA
2.3%
BRF
14.2%

Technology

KSA
2.2%
BRF
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSA vs. BRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSA
KSA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
KSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BRF
BRF Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSA vs. BRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KSABRFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.15

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

1.27

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

3.58

-2.90

KSA vs. BRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the BRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSA and BRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KSABRFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

0.72

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

-0.11

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.20

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.06

+0.25

Drawdowns

KSA vs. BRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSA drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum BRF drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSA and BRF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSABRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-82.26%

+41.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-16.11%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-37.81%

+22.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-50.49%

+22.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-60.43%

+19.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.69%

-48.77%

+32.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-45.74%

+34.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

5.72%

-0.54%

Volatility

KSA vs. BRF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) is 3.70%, while VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that KSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSABRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

10.39%

-6.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

24.39%

-12.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

28.46%

-11.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

31.66%

-15.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

33.94%

-13.90%

KSA vs. BRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSA has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BRF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSA vs. BRF - Dividend Comparison

KSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than BRF's 5.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.28%5.54%4.08%5.02%4.13%2.96%1.66%2.54%2.89%4.53%4.25%3.84%
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
2.81%2.95%3.44%2.44%1.93%1.58%1.76%2.15%2.51%2.30%3.05%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


KSA and BRF have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRF has higher volatility (10.39%) compared to KSA (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSA dropped -40.56% vs BRF's -82.26%.

On 10-year performance, KSA leads with 7.46% vs 6.61% for BRF. On fees, BRF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KSA has performed better with a 7.46% return vs 6.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BRF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KSA.

BRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 2.81% for KSA.

KSA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BRF is Latin America Equities. KSA tracks MSCI Saudi Arabia Investable Market Index (IMI) 25/50 Index, while BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for KSA and 0.60% for BRF.

BRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSA and BRF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer