KRUZ vs. GXLC
KRUZ (Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. KRUZ is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. KRUZ charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
KRUZ vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KRUZ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 6M
- 6.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KRUZ vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KRUZ Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 7.92% | 3.22% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRUZ vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (KRUZ) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRUZ vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRUZ | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.40% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.56% | — |
Volatility
KRUZ vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRUZ | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.78% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 13.78% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 13.78% | — |
KRUZ vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRUZ has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
KRUZ vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
KRUZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.65% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KRUZ Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for KRUZ.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for KRUZ.
They also come from different issuers: Subversive and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for KRUZ and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for KRUZ and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer