KRUZ vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KRUZ (Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KRUZ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Subversive, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. KRUZ is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KRUZ charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

KRUZ vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (KRUZ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KRUZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 25.87%
• YTD: 77.13%
• 6M: 75.61%
• 1Y: 157.20%
• 3Y*: 64.17%
• 5Y*: 39.21%
• 10Y*: 37.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRUZ vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KRUZ Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF	0.00%	-1.31%	14.45%	10.16%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	77.13%	49.17%	39.10%	39.54%

Correlation

The correlation between KRUZ and SMH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023	0.48

KRUZ vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KRUZ	SMH
Technology	24.2%	100.0%
Financial Services	16.3%	-
Industrials	14.0%	-
Energy	11.8%	-
Healthcare	7.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	-
Communication Services	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	4.6%	-
Utilities	1.8%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

KRUZ vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRUZ vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (KRUZ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KRUZ	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.34	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KRUZ	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-84.96%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.09%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KRUZ	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	30.56%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	35.01%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	32.57%	—

KRUZ vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRUZ has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

KRUZ vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

KRUZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KRUZ Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.57%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.17%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRUZ and SMH in my portfolio?

KRUZ and SMH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KRUZ or SMH?

On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KRUZ or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for KRUZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KRUZ or SMH?

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for KRUZ.

What is the main difference between KRUZ and SMH?

KRUZ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Subversive and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for KRUZ and 0.35% for SMH.