KRUS vs. AMAT
KRUS (Kura Sushi USA, Inc.) and AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) are both stocks. KRUS operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while AMAT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 5 years, KRUS returned 3.14%/yr vs 30.15%/yr for AMAT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KRUS vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRUS achieves a -15.63% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 95.35% return.
KRUS
- 1D
- -5.28%
- 1M
- -18.29%
- YTD
- -15.63%
- 6M
- -14.44%
- 1Y
- -39.19%
- 3Y*
- -18.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- —
AMAT
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 28.11%
- YTD
- 95.35%
- 6M
- 86.88%
- 1Y
- 211.89%
- 3Y*
- 56.21%
- 5Y*
- 30.15%
- 10Y*
- 36.77%
KRUS vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRUS Kura Sushi USA, Inc. | -15.63% | -42.23% | 19.18% | 59.40% | -41.02% | 314.56% | -23.38% | 29.78% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 95.35% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 26.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRUS and AMAT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019 | 0.28 |
The correlation between KRUS and AMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KRUS:
$535.10M
AMAT:
$400.12B
KRUS:
-$0.16
AMAT:
$10.61
KRUS:
1.76
AMAT:
13.83
KRUS:
2.34
AMAT:
16.73
KRUS:
$306.89M
AMAT:
$29.02B
KRUS:
$81.26M
AMAT:
$14.21B
KRUS:
$14.03M
AMAT:
$9.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRUS vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
KRUS
AMAT
KRUS vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KRUS | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.59 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 9.98 | -10.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 28.53 | -29.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KRUS | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 4.63 | -5.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.70 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.43 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
KRUS vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRUS drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRUS and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRUS | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.65% | -85.22% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.47% | -21.37% | -34.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.44% | -49.88% | -15.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.44% | -55.14% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.20% | 0.00% | -63.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -38.81% | +7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.00% | 7.46% | +25.54% |
Volatility
KRUS vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) has a higher volatility of 19.47% compared to Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 15.12%. This indicates that KRUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRUS | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.47% | 15.12% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.57% | 35.27% | +12.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.91% | 46.10% | +17.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.11% | 43.57% | +28.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.91% | 42.61% | +36.30% |
Dividends
KRUS vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
KRUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
KRUS Kura Sushi USA, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KRUS vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kura Sushi USA, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KRUS vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison
KRUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 55.70M and revenue of 80.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.6%.
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.
KRUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.23M and revenue of 80.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.
KRUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reported a net income of -1.71M and revenue of 80.02M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KRUS and AMAT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRUS has higher volatility (19.47%) compared to AMAT (15.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRUS dropped -81.65% vs AMAT's -85.22%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRUS and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer