PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KRUS vs. CMG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


KRUSCMG
YTD Return22.95%30.98%
1Y Return58.86%38.95%
3Y Return (Ann)9.79%17.70%
5Y Return (Ann)30.94%31.83%
Sharpe Ratio0.951.34
Sortino Ratio1.591.82
Omega Ratio1.221.26
Calmar Ratio1.061.40
Martin Ratio2.283.35
Ulcer Index27.66%11.44%
Daily Std Dev66.43%28.59%
Max Drawdown-81.65%-74.61%
Current Drawdown-22.12%-12.61%

Fundamentals


KRUSCMG
Market Cap$1.02B$82.42B
EPS-$0.79$1.08
Total Revenue (TTM)$237.86M$10.98B
Gross Profit (TTM)$29.20M$2.78B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.31M$2.30B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between KRUS and CMG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

KRUS vs. CMG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, KRUS achieves a 22.95% return, which is significantly lower than CMG's 30.98% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-19.50%
-4.78%
KRUS
CMG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KRUS vs. CMG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KRUS, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KRUS, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KRUS, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KRUS, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KRUS, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.28
CMG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMG, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMG, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CMG, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMG, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CMG, currently valued at 3.35, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.35

KRUS vs. CMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the CMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRUS and CMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.95
1.34
KRUS
CMG

Dividends

KRUS vs. CMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither KRUS nor CMG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KRUS vs. CMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRUS drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than CMG's maximum drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRUS and CMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-22.12%
-12.61%
KRUS
CMG

Volatility

KRUS vs. CMG - Volatility Comparison

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) has a higher volatility of 18.93% compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) at 11.82%. This indicates that KRUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.93%
11.82%
KRUS
CMG

Financials

KRUS vs. CMG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kura Sushi USA, Inc. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items