KRUS vs. CMG
KRUS (Kura Sushi USA, Inc.) and CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 5 years, KRUS returned -1.07%/yr vs -0.03%/yr for CMG. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KRUS vs. CMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRUS achieves a -11.96% return, which is significantly lower than CMG's 0.59% return.
KRUS
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -20.03%
- 6M
- -31.04%
- YTD
- -11.96%
- 1Y
- -46.37%
- 3Y*
- -22.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.52%
CMG
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- 6M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- -12.46%
- 3Y*
- -1.63%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 16.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $612.37M | $603.10M | $624.35M | |
| $11.54M | $16.82M | $18.65M |
KRUS vs. CMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRUS Kura Sushi USA, Inc. | -11.96% | -42.23% | 19.18% | 59.40% | -41.02% | 314.56% | -23.38% | 70.92% |
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 0.59% | -38.64% | 31.83% | 64.83% | -20.64% | 26.07% | 65.65% | 5.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRUS and CMG is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
KRUS:
$559.74M
CMG:
$47.77B
KRUS:
-$0.17
CMG:
$1.08
KRUS:
1.77
CMG:
3.93
KRUS:
2.47
CMG:
21.83
KRUS:
$318.84M
CMG:
$12.42B
KRUS:
$85.62M
CMG:
$5.89B
KRUS:
$14.70M
CMG:
$2.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRUS vs. CMG — Risk / Return Rank
KRUS
CMG
KRUS vs. CMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRUS | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.97 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.37 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -0.67 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRUS vs. CMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRUS drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than CMG's maximum drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRUS and CMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRUS | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.65% | -74.61% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.61% | -36.01% | -15.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.44% | -58.89% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.44% | -58.89% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.60% | -45.71% | -15.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.90% | -21.56% | -10.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.23% | 19.85% | +13.38% |
Volatility
KRUS vs. CMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) is 12.96%, while Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that KRUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRUS | CMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.96% | 17.31% | -4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.79% | 29.05% | +17.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.04% | 39.89% | +22.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.00% | 34.19% | +36.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.37% | 35.97% | +43.40% |
Dividends
KRUS vs. CMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither KRUS nor CMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
KRUS vs. CMG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kura Sushi USA, Inc. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KRUS vs. CMG - Profitability Comparison
KRUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.01M and revenue of 85.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.8%.
CMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.34B and revenue of 3.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.8%.
KRUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reported an operating income of -39.00K and revenue of 85.92M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.1%.
CMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported an operating income of 525.60M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.7%.
KRUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kura Sushi USA, Inc. reported a net income of 423.00K and revenue of 85.92M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.
CMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a net income of 403.55M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KRUS and CMG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMG has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to KRUS (12.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRUS dropped -81.65% vs CMG's -74.61%.
CMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRUS and CMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer